STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[subhash <subhash AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Dear Li-Ke,

Thanks for the updated version and considering our suggestions. I have a 
few additional ones. I sign off once these are addressed.

line 31: Hence, the anisotropic ... information on the ...
line 32: You could rephrase like: A hint of smaller v2 for \phi mesons 
compared to charged particles is observed for BES-I Au+Au collisions at 
sNN = 7.7 and 11.5 GeV.
line 36: 19.6 and 14.6 GeV.
line 41: Time Projection Chamber (TPC), then line 46 can be simply "TPC"
line 42: ... along the radial direction, Vr, is selected to be smaller 
than
remove "at these two energies"
line 46: At intermediate and high transverse momenta ...
line 50: by varying the above analysis cuts.
You could add a few more sentence after this, like typical systematic 
errors or dominant source of systematic errors etc.
line 53: mid-central (10-40%) Au+Au collisions
line 58: is grouped ..
line 60: 0-30% and 30-70% Au+Au ...
line 63: fluctuations are the dominant ...
line 74: ... in finer centrality bins is underway ...
line 80: ... anti-particles held better than particles ...
line 104: (STAR Collaboration), remove "1301.2348"

Thanks and regards,
Subhash

On 2022-08-18 06:32 PM, LikeLiu wrote:
> Dear Subhash and Prithwish,
>
> Many thanks for your suggestions, please find the updated version by
> below link:
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/Like_SQM_proceedings_ver2.pdf
>
> Thanks and best regards,
> Li-Ke
>
> > 2022年8月16日 上午5:42，Prithwish Tribedy via Star-fcv-l
> > <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> 写道：
> >
> > Hi Li-Ke,
> > Here are my minor comments on your nice proceedings.
> >
> > General: You need an extra space between the words and the
> > reference. So please check and change as follows: "ABCD[]" --> :ABCD
> > []". Change "high energy" -->"high-energy" everywhere. Try to write
> > "\sqrt{s_{_{NN}}}=19.6 GeV" instead to just "19.6 GeV".
> >
> > line 7-8: "in BES-II 19.6 GeV and 14.6 GeV at STAR," -->"in 19.6 GeV
> > and 14.6 GeV Au+Au collisions, from STAR"
> >
> > line 10: "flow has been built up" --> "flow is built up"
> >
> > line 17: "has been built-up" --> "is created in high-energy heavy
> > ion collisions"
> >
> > line 18: "into the QGP" --> "to the QGP"
> >
> > 1ine 19: "at finite baryon" --> "at a finite baryon"
> >
> > line 23: "energy coverage" --> "the energy range of the BES program
> > is"
> >
> > I think it's better to revise the sentence as follows: "With the BES
> > program, RHIC collisions can cover an energy range of 3.0-200 GeV
> > that provides the lever-arm to vary the baryon chemical potential
> > over the range of XX-YY"
> >
> > net baryon chemical potential --> baryon chemical potential.
> >
> > line 26: "plane, often referred to" --> "plane is referred to"
> >
> > line 32: Remove "primarily" and change "from the early stages" -->
> > "of the early stages"
> >
> > line 36: add "we apply criteria such as" before "p_t>0.2 GeV/c"
> >
> > line 45: "The K_S^0, \Lambda,..." --> "The strange hadrons such as
> > K_S^0, \Lambda,..."
> >
> > line 46: "\phi mesons" --> "The \phi mesons"
> >
> > line 51: "identified particles" --> "the identified particles"
> >
> > line 59: "Unlike v_2 strongly relies on centrality, there is a weak
> > centrality" --> "Unlike v_2, there is a weak centrality"
> > (remove: strongly relies on centrality)
> >
> > line 61: "fluctuation" --> "fluctuations"
> >
> > Fig.3 caption: "nq" --> "n_q"
> >
> > line 63: Define "NCQ"
> >
> > line 66: "degree of freedom" --> "degrees of freedom"
> >
> > line 70: "\phi mesons v_2" --> "\phi meson v_2"
> >
> > line 77: "of anti-particles is better than particle" --> "of
> > anti-particles is held better than particles"
> >
> > line 80: "a large coverage of baryon chemical potential" --> (START
> > a NEW SENTENCE) "Such datasets will help scan the QCD phase diagram
> > over a wide range of baryon chemical potential"
> >
> > "line 83: "EoS of produced QCD matter" --> "EoS of the produced QCD
> > matter"
> >
> > Best,
> > Prithwish
> >
> > On 2022-08-15 05:37, subhash via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> > Dear Li-Ke,
> > Thanks for posting the proceedings. I have appended my suggestions
> > here:
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/Like_SQM_proceedings_ver1_0_SS.pdf
> > Thanks and regards,
> > Subhash
> > On 2022-08-13 11:46 PM, LikeLiu via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> > Dear All,
> > Sorry for the double entry caused by the net issue, please ignore
> > the
> > former email.
> > Thanks!
> > Best regards,
> > Li-Ke
> > 2022年8月13日 下午11:32，webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l
> > <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov> 写道：
> > Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> > Like Liu (likeliu AT mails.ccnu.edu.cn) has submitted a material for a
> > review,
> > please have a look:
> > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/60500
> > ---
> > If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> > webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> > _______________________________________________
> > Star-fcv-l mailing list
> > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
> > _______________________________________________
> > Star-fcv-l mailing list
> > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
>  _______________________________________________
> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fcv-l mailing list
> Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l