STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG

[subhash <subhash AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Dear Sharang,

Thanks for the reminder. I sent it to star-talks.

A gentle reminder on STAR policy is that please post proceedings at 
least two weeks before the deadline, so all conveners have the time to 
read through it.

Thanks and regards,
Subhash

On 2023-11-29 12:02 PM, sharangrav wrote:
> Dear Subhash,
>
> A very gentle reminder for your further comments on the my
> proceedings. As the deadline is approaching on the 30th of this month,
> and if there are no further comments can we please proceed further for
> the approval.
>
> Thanks and regards,
> Sharang
>
> On 2023-11-26 10:01, sharangrav via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> > Dear Subhash,
> >
> > A gentle reminder for your further comments on my proceedings.
> > Here is the link to updated version: 
> > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/66043
> > The deadline for the same is 30th November. Apologies for the 
> > inconvenience.
> >
> > Thanks and regards,
> > Sharang
> >
> > On 2023-11-23 23:20, sharangrav via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> > > Dear Subhash,
> > >
> > > Thanks for your nice comments. I have incorporated all of them in the
> > > updated version and here is the link to the same.
> > > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/66043
> > > Please le me know if you have further comments.
> > >
> > > Thanks and regards,
> > > Sharang
> > >
> > > On 2023-11-22 18:47, subhash via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> > > > Dear Sharang,
> > > >
> > > > Nice proceedings. I have a few suggestions below for your 
> > > > consideration:
> > > >
> > > > l#10: at s_NN  = 3.2, ...
> > > >
> > > > l#11, 12: for identified hadrons (pi, K, p) and net-particles (net K
> > > > and net p) ....
> > > >
> > > > l#13, 14: The minimum in v1 slope for net-kaon is observed at lower
> > > > collision energy than net-proton
> > > > --> I think we don't have sufficient data to comment about the
> > > > minimum. You can probably say that the sign change occurred at
> > > > different energy.
> > > >
> > > > l#18: "The v3 slope for all particles decreases in magnitude with
> > > > increasing collision energy, indicating the effect of the mean-field
> > > > at the low energies."
> > > > --> How mean field connected to energy dependence, can you explain?
> > > > There could be multiple effects folded in here mean-field, baryon
> > > > stopping, geometry, ... right?
> > > >
> > > > l#51, 55 and else where add a space X ~ GeV
> > > >
> > > > l#59: remove bracket on \kappa
> > > >
> > > > l#61,62: add a reference
> > > >
> > > > l#66: The traditional v3, ...
> > > >
> > > > l#77: In these proceedings,
> > > >
> > > > l#88-93: You could mention the kinematics, pt, eta selections and
> > > > track selection conditions before introducing particle 
> > > > identification.
> > > >
> > > > l#93: I guess you are not using z-variable for all species, only for
> > > > light nuclei. For other species you are using combination with 
> > > > Nsigma.
> > > > So modify the discussions accordingly.
> > > >
> > > > l#113: You could mention what is used as weight in Q reconstruction
> > > >
> > > > l#130:  employed in the collider BES-I
> > > >
> > > > l#141, 142: you can add model comparison or a reference for backing 
> > > > up
> > > > the statement
> > > >
> > > > l#155: linear term in a third-order polynomial, right?
> > > >
> > > > l#160: Suggest to change the statement that we observe a sign change
> > > > than observe a minima, as mentioned above. Also make a similar 
> > > > change
> > > > in the conclusion.
> > > >
> > > > l#172,  173: modify the statement that it is not solely from
> > > > mean-field. Also make a similar change in the conclusion.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks and regards,
> > > > Subhash
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 2023-11-20 01:44 PM, webmaster--- via Star-fcv-l wrote:
> > > > > Dear star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> > > > >
> > > > > Sharang Rav Sharma (sharang.rav AT students.iisertirupati.ac.in) has 
> > > > > submitted a
> > > > > material for a review, please have a look:
> > > > > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/66043
> > > > >
> > > > > ---
> > > > > If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> > > > > webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Star-fcv-l mailing list
> > > > > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > > > > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Star-fcv-l mailing list
> > > > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > > > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Star-fcv-l mailing list
> > > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l
> > _______________________________________________
> > Star-fcv-l mailing list
> > Star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fcv-l