star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG
List archive
Re: [[Star-fcv-l] ] Request for GPC formation: "Hyperon polarization in isobar Ru+Ru and Zr+Zr collisions at \snn = 200 GeV"
- From: subhash <subhash AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
- To: xgou <xgou AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
- Cc: "STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG" <star-fcv-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Subject: Re: [[Star-fcv-l] ] Request for GPC formation: "Hyperon polarization in isobar Ru+Ru and Zr+Zr collisions at \snn = 200 GeV"
- Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2024 18:13:13 +0800
Dear Xingrui, PAs,
It is great to see the isobar global polarization paper getting ready. I have a few comments for your consideration:
Fig. 1: Are these only fit lines. It might be good, if you draw them as points. Also make sure X,Y axis are not touching the labels.
Fig. 4-5: In data/model comparison figures, you have four cases Lambda and s-quark scenario for lambda and anti-lambda in different colors, it would be good to label the model in a better way or at least mention the color coding in the caption.
Azimuthal angle dependence line 332-336: I think we should not discuss the STAR preliminary results in a paper. Although it is a pity that we don't have P_yc2 from Au+Au published yet.
About P_yc0 and P_yc2, I was wondering is there any motivation for showing both of them. The measurements are very nice, I am wondering is there any physics we can disentangle with these two values? Or is it merely a cross-check.
line 349: Could you remind me which paper or analysis [61] are you referring to?
Fig. 9: How do you do the average for 20-50% centrality? I see the Xi-via daughter (blue) are consistently larger than zero, while direct Xi's (red) are smaller than zero. But when you averaged the pattern flipped. Can you double check.
Can we comapre the xi-polarization between isobar and Au+Au, although the error bar may not allow but I was wondering where they stand, especially Xi-via-daughter?
I would also suggest preparing supplemental data points or figures for lambda anti-lambda polarization separately for Ru+Ru and Zr+Zr. This would be important for someone outside STAR who don't have access to individuals collision species.
I sign-off with these addressed.
Thanks and regards,
Subhash
On 2024-07-30 09:37 AM, xgou wrote:
Dear conveners,
I hope this email finds you well.
It has been over two weeks since I submitted the GPC request, and I
am writing to inquire about its current status. Could you kindly
inform me if there has been any progress in the review process?
Additionally, please let me know if there are any further materials
or information I need to provide to facilitate the evaluation.
Thank you very much. I look forward to your response.
Best regards,
Xingrui
Dear FCV Conveners,
We would like to request the GPC formation for our paper titled
"Hyperon Polarization in Isobar Ru+Ru and Zr+Zr Collisions at \snn =
200 GeV." Our target journal for this submission is Physics Letters B
(PLB).
The latest draft of the paper can be found here:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/STAR_Isobar_Polarization%20%285%29.pdf
The latest draft of analysis note can be found here:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/AnalysisNote_isobarPH_v2_0.pdf
Additionally, the paper proposal blog, which includes the proposed
figures, paper draft, analysis note, and other relevant details, can
be accessed hereļ¼
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/blog/xgou/Paper-proposal-global-polarization-isobar-collisions-webpage
Please let us know if you have any comments or suggestions from your
end so that we can proceed with moving this paper towards publication.
Sincerely,
Xingrui Gou
- Re: [[Star-fcv-l] ] Request for GPC formation: "Hyperon polarization in isobar Ru+Ru and Zr+Zr collisions at \snn = 200 GeV", subhash, 08/02/2024
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.