Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-fst-l - Re: [Star-fst-l] Updates on the silicon simulation

star-fst-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: Star-fst-l mailing list

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Daniel Brandenburg <dbrandenburg.ufl AT gmail.com>
  • To: Zhenyu Ye <yezhenyu2003 AT gmail.com>
  • Cc: "star-fst-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <star-fst-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Star-fst-l] Updates on the silicon simulation
  • Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 11:03:18 -0400

Hi All,

I could not join due to overlapping meetings. The plan is not to "merge" the two, but only to make a single geometry tag that has both up-to-date. 

The Silicon and sTGGC will be different geometry definitions so that they can be independent of each other. The new sTGC geometry is already independent of the Si, I just need a little time to make a geometry "tag" that has both up-to-date geometries.

Thanks and good work Te-Chuan, it looks good. 

Best,
Daniel

On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 10:54 AM Zhenyu Ye <yezhenyu2003 AT gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Te-Chuan,

Nice work.

On the last slide, do you know what the motivation is  to merge FST and sTGC geometries? I think it is better to keep them separated, same for the simulators, so that one can update the FST or sTGC software without worrying about affecting the other one, or how to keep the code synchronized. This is what we did for HFT, with PXL/IST/SSD separated. I brought this idea up of separating FST and sTGC in the simulation software at a forward upgrade meeting about half a year (?) ago, and Daniel Brandenburg (cc’ed) certainly supported it and agreed to do the splitting for the simulators

Best,
Zhenyu

> On Jul 11, 2019, at 9:06 AM, Te-Chuan Huang <tchuang.phys AT gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> Sorry, I couldn’t get my presentation ready before the meeting.
> i have upload it to the meeting drupal page: https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/event/2019/07/11/star-forward-silicon-tracker-meeting/simulation
>
> The problem I presented before that only part of the silicons have hits is now fixed.
> The issue was the mother volumes containing silicons were too small that some of the silicons were outside the mother volumes.
> So, the GEANT couldn’t catch up the material outside the mother volumes.
> After fixing this issue, everything looks reasonable.
>
> Cheers,
> Te-Chuan
>
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fst-l mailing list
> Star-fst-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fst-l




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page