star-fst-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: Star-fst-l mailing list
List archive
Re: [Star-fst-l] Updates on the silicon simulation
- From: Zhenyu Ye <yezhenyu2003 AT gmail.com>
- To: Te-Chuan Huang <tchuang.phys AT gmail.com>
- Cc: "star-fst-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <star-fst-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Subject: Re: [Star-fst-l] Updates on the silicon simulation
- Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 10:27:30 -0500
Thanks for the clarification, Daniel, Te-Chuan.
What is the status of the Fast Simulators? Have the FST and sTGC codes been
separated?
Zhenyu
> On Jul 11, 2019, at 10:20 AM, Te-Chuan Huang <tchuang.phys AT gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Zhenyu and Daniel,
>
> The silicon and sTGC geometries could definitely be separated but we may
> need to build up the GEANT hit tables for each of them (g2t_fst_hit and
> g2t_tgc_hit ?).
> Currently, Zhenyu Chen and I just modified the old one (g2t_fts_hit) from
> Jason to get our geometries work.
> I said “combine the two” just meant to get both geometries work in the same
> geometry tag (just like ftsref6a we were using) for the further tests.
>
> Cheers,
> Te-Chuan
>
>
>> On Jul 11, 2019, at 10:54 AM, Zhenyu Ye <yezhenyu2003 AT gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Te-Chuan,
>>
>> Nice work.
>>
>> On the last slide, do you know what the motivation is to merge FST and
>> sTGC geometries? I think it is better to keep them separated, same for the
>> simulators, so that one can update the FST or sTGC software without
>> worrying about affecting the other one, or how to keep the code
>> synchronized. This is what we did for HFT, with PXL/IST/SSD separated. I
>> brought this idea up of separating FST and sTGC in the simulation software
>> at a forward upgrade meeting about half a year (?) ago, and Daniel
>> Brandenburg (cc’ed) certainly supported it and agreed to do the splitting
>> for the simulators
>>
>> Best,
>> Zhenyu
>>
>>> On Jul 11, 2019, at 9:06 AM, Te-Chuan Huang <tchuang.phys AT gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear All,
>>>
>>> Sorry, I couldn’t get my presentation ready before the meeting.
>>> i have upload it to the meeting drupal page:
>>> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/event/2019/07/11/star-forward-silicon-tracker-meeting/simulation
>>>
>>> The problem I presented before that only part of the silicons have hits
>>> is now fixed.
>>> The issue was the mother volumes containing silicons were too small that
>>> some of the silicons were outside the mother volumes.
>>> So, the GEANT couldn’t catch up the material outside the mother volumes.
>>> After fixing this issue, everything looks reasonable.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Te-Chuan
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Star-fst-l mailing list
>>> Star-fst-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fst-l
>>
>
-
[Star-fst-l] Updates on the silicon simulation,
Te-Chuan Huang, 07/11/2019
- Re: [Star-fst-l] Updates on the silicon simulation, Yi Yang, 07/11/2019
-
Re: [Star-fst-l] Updates on the silicon simulation,
Zhenyu Ye, 07/11/2019
- Re: [Star-fst-l] Updates on the silicon simulation, Daniel Brandenburg, 07/11/2019
-
Re: [Star-fst-l] Updates on the silicon simulation,
Te-Chuan Huang, 07/11/2019
-
Re: [Star-fst-l] Updates on the silicon simulation,
Zhenyu Ye, 07/11/2019
- Re: [Star-fst-l] Updates on the silicon simulation, Daniel Brandenburg, 07/11/2019
-
Re: [Star-fst-l] Updates on the silicon simulation,
Zhenyu Ye, 07/11/2019
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.