star-fst-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: Star-fst-l mailing list
List archive
Re: [Star-fst-l] Updates on the silicon simulation
- From: Te-Chuan Huang <tchuang.phys AT gmail.com>
- To: Zhenyu Ye <yezhenyu2003 AT gmail.com>
- Cc: "star-fst-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <star-fst-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Subject: Re: [Star-fst-l] Updates on the silicon simulation
- Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 11:20:58 -0400
Hi Zhenyu and Daniel,
The silicon and sTGC geometries could definitely be separated but we may need
to build up the GEANT hit tables for each of them (g2t_fst_hit and
g2t_tgc_hit ?).
Currently, Zhenyu Chen and I just modified the old one (g2t_fts_hit) from
Jason to get our geometries work.
I said “combine the two” just meant to get both geometries work in the same
geometry tag (just like ftsref6a we were using) for the further tests.
Cheers,
Te-Chuan
> On Jul 11, 2019, at 10:54 AM, Zhenyu Ye <yezhenyu2003 AT gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Te-Chuan,
>
> Nice work.
>
> On the last slide, do you know what the motivation is to merge FST and
> sTGC geometries? I think it is better to keep them separated, same for the
> simulators, so that one can update the FST or sTGC software without
> worrying about affecting the other one, or how to keep the code
> synchronized. This is what we did for HFT, with PXL/IST/SSD separated. I
> brought this idea up of separating FST and sTGC in the simulation software
> at a forward upgrade meeting about half a year (?) ago, and Daniel
> Brandenburg (cc’ed) certainly supported it and agreed to do the splitting
> for the simulators
>
> Best,
> Zhenyu
>
>> On Jul 11, 2019, at 9:06 AM, Te-Chuan Huang <tchuang.phys AT gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> Sorry, I couldn’t get my presentation ready before the meeting.
>> i have upload it to the meeting drupal page:
>> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/event/2019/07/11/star-forward-silicon-tracker-meeting/simulation
>>
>> The problem I presented before that only part of the silicons have hits is
>> now fixed.
>> The issue was the mother volumes containing silicons were too small that
>> some of the silicons were outside the mother volumes.
>> So, the GEANT couldn’t catch up the material outside the mother volumes.
>> After fixing this issue, everything looks reasonable.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Te-Chuan
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Star-fst-l mailing list
>> Star-fst-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fst-l
>
-
[Star-fst-l] Updates on the silicon simulation,
Te-Chuan Huang, 07/11/2019
- Re: [Star-fst-l] Updates on the silicon simulation, Yi Yang, 07/11/2019
-
Re: [Star-fst-l] Updates on the silicon simulation,
Zhenyu Ye, 07/11/2019
- Re: [Star-fst-l] Updates on the silicon simulation, Daniel Brandenburg, 07/11/2019
-
Re: [Star-fst-l] Updates on the silicon simulation,
Te-Chuan Huang, 07/11/2019
-
Re: [Star-fst-l] Updates on the silicon simulation,
Zhenyu Ye, 07/11/2019
- Re: [Star-fst-l] Updates on the silicon simulation, Daniel Brandenburg, 07/11/2019
-
Re: [Star-fst-l] Updates on the silicon simulation,
Zhenyu Ye, 07/11/2019
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.