Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-fst-l - Re: [Star-fst-l] noise vs bias for worst channel and typical channel?

star-fst-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: Star-fst-l mailing list

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Gerard Visser <gvisser AT indiana.edu>
  • To: Zhenyu Ye <yezhenyu2003 AT gmail.com>
  • Cc: "star-fst-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <star-fst-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Star-fst-l] noise vs bias for worst channel and typical channel?
  • Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2020 14:12:06 -0400

Hi Xu, Zhenyu,
Do we see the timebin-dependece of noise as you show here

https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/event/2020/05/04/star-forward-silicon-tracker-meeting/prototype-module-assembly-and-test

in the IST data too?
Thanks,

Gerard


p.s. And, if possible to answer, there is also the question whether this was seen in the IST installed in STAR/HFT? I don't remember hearing about it before.


On 8/4/2020 12:39 PM, Zhenyu Ye wrote:
Hi Gerard,

On Aug 4, 2020, at 11:19 AM, Gerard Visser <gvisser AT indiana.edu> wrote:

hi Zhenyu,
That timebon dependence sounds definitely odd. Are you sure? Do we
see that in IST too, only more mildly? I wasn't aware of this.

Please take a look at Xu’s presentation in FST meeting on May 4 (FST) and 11
(FST and IST):

https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/event/2020/05/04/star-forward-silicon-tracker-meeting/prototype-module-assembly-and-test
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/event/2020/05/11/star-forward-silicon-tracker-meeting/prototype-module-assembly-and-test

The capacitance of FST is much larger than IST, I think. This may
certainly be relevant. For sure it is relevant to CMN.
Anyway, I agree we should investigate these noise issues, I do not
like to ignore them. However on the other hand it _may_ be an inherent
property of APV chips.

- Gerard



On 8/4/2020 12:12 PM, Zhenyu Ye wrote:
Hi Gerard,
From the plots that Xu sent, there is a clear pattern where the channels
showing enhanced noise level after mounting the sensors, also show enhanced
noise level before mounting the sensors.
An independent topic, we see that the CMN in FST is much higher than IST, and
show a strong time-bin dependence, i.e., when we read in 9 time bins, the
1st, 5th and 9th time bins have much higher CMN than the other time bins. I
don’t feel comfortable to ignore it w/o knowing the cause, as it may get
worse in the real experiment.
Best,
Zhenyu




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page