star-gpc-355-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR GPC #355

List archive

Re: [Star-gpc-355-l] Reply to institutional comments on the long paper for CME isobar baseline

From: James Dunlop <dunlop AT bnl.gov>
To: "Feng, Yicheng" <feng216 AT purdue.edu>
Cc: James Dunlop <dunlop AT bnl.gov>, STAR GPC #355 <star-gpc-355-l AT lists.bnl.gov>, Fuqiang Wang <fqwang AT purdue.edu>
Subject: Re: [Star-gpc-355-l] Reply to institutional comments on the long paper for CME isobar baseline
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 15:18:05 -0400

Hi Yicheng,

These look pretty non-controversial to me. Others in the GPC?

The only thing that gives me pause is the comment from NISER, l. 440,

about identical figures. This might be an issue, in that PRL now

has a policy (looks like it was updated in 2017) about joint submissions that

says https://journals.aps.org/prl/authors:

"The longer manuscript should provide a substantially increased understanding of the subject while keeping the overlap of figures, tables, and text material to a minimum."

Is this really a minimum?

Another question I have, actually, is have we lost the chance for joint submission, maybe this is

to Sooraj/management. We won't have submitted these simultaneously, right?

"When authors submit simultaneously to Physical Review Letters and to Physical Review, the two manuscripts are reviewed coherently, typically by the same reviewers. If both papers receive favorable reviews, they are published together, unless simultaneous publication leads to undue delay for one of the papers."

--J

On Sep 20, 2023, at 9:45 AM, Feng, Yicheng <feng216 AT purdue.edu> wrote:

Hi GPC,

We have got the comments on the long paper from SCSU, ACU, NISER, and IMP groups.
We tried to reply to those comments and modify the paper draft accordingly.

The related files have been uploaded to drupal webpage:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/blog/fengyich/Background-Baseline-CME-Isobar-Collisions-Webpage
→reply to comments: https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/Reply_InstRev_IsobarNfBkg_20230821_v7.pdf
→revised long paper: https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/IsobarNfBkg_L_v27.pdf
latexdiff: https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/diff_IsobarNfBkg_L_v18v27.pdf

If you have any further comments, please let me know.

After you think it is ready, we can then return the updates to star-papers-l.

Sincerely,
Yicheng for the PAs

He/Him/His
Please do not feel obligated to respond to this message outside of your work hours.

James C Dunlop Ph.: (631) 344-7781

Building 510A Cell: (631)316-8153

P.O. Box 5000

Brookhaven National Laboratory

Upton, NY 11973

dunlop AT bnl.gov

[Star-gpc-355-l] Reply to institutional comments on the long paper for CME isobar baseline, Feng, Yicheng, 09/20/2023
- Re: [Star-gpc-355-l] Reply to institutional comments on the long paper for CME isobar baseline, James Dunlop, 09/20/2023
  - Re: [Star-gpc-355-l] Reply to institutional comments on the long paper for CME isobar baseline, Feng, Yicheng, 09/20/2023
    - Re: [Star-gpc-355-l] Reply to institutional comments on the long paper for CME isobar baseline, Feng, Yicheng, 09/28/2023
      - Re: [Star-gpc-355-l] Reply to institutional comments on the long paper for CME isobar baseline, James Dunlop, 09/28/2023
        
        Re: [Star-gpc-355-l] Reply to institutional comments on the long paper for CME isobar baseline, Feng, Yicheng, 09/28/2023
        
        Re: [Star-gpc-355-l] Reply to institutional comments on the long paper for CME isobar baseline, Feng, Yicheng, 09/28/2023