Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-gpc-355-l - Re: [Star-gpc-355-l] Reply to institutional comments on the long paper for CME isobar baseline

star-gpc-355-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR GPC #355

List archive

Re: [Star-gpc-355-l] Reply to institutional comments on the long paper for CME isobar baseline

Chronological Thread  
    < Chronological >       < Thread >
  • From: "Feng, Yicheng" <feng216 AT purdue.edu>
  • To: STAR GPC #355 <star-gpc-355-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Star-gpc-355-l] Reply to institutional comments on the long paper for CME isobar baseline
  • Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2023 23:46:03 +0000
Just for clarification, I meant next Monday night (not today), as Jamie suggested. 
If you have any further comments, please feel free to let me know before that. 

Sorry for any confusions.

Sincerely,
Yicheng
From: Star-gpc-355-l <star-gpc-355-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of Feng, Yicheng via Star-gpc-355-l <star-gpc-355-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2023 7:20 PM
To: James Dunlop <dunlop AT bnl.gov>
Cc: Feng, Yicheng <feng216 AT purdue.edu>; STAR GPC #355 <star-gpc-355-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: Re: [Star-gpc-355-l] Reply to institutional comments on the long paper for CME isobar baseline
 
---- External Email: Use caution with attachments, links, or sharing data ----

Hi Jamie and All,

Thank you for your instructions. 
Since I do not see any further comments from GPC, 
I will return the updates to starpapers-l and let Sooraj know at around 8pm EST. 

Sincerely,
Yicheng
From: James Dunlop <dunlop AT bnl.gov>
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2023 11:36 AM
To: Feng, Yicheng <feng216 AT purdue.edu>
Cc: James Dunlop <dunlop AT bnl.gov>; STAR GPC #355 <star-gpc-355-l AT lists.bnl.gov>; Wang, Fuqiang <fqwang AT purdue.edu>
Subject: Re: Reply to institutional comments on the long paper for CME isobar baseline
 
---- External Email: Use caution with attachments, links, or sharing data ----

Ok, I guess that's fine, just hope it doesn't hold up the review at
the journal.  So if there aren't any further comments by COB Monday
feel free to put it on starpapers and let Sooraj know.
--J

On Sep 28, 2023, at 11:26 AM, Feng, Yicheng <feng216 AT purdue.edu> wrote:

Hi Jamie and All, 

We understand Jamie's concern on the overlapping figures between the short and long papers. 
For now, we prefer to keep them as they are. 
If the editor(s) also brings this up during the review, we can make adjustments then. 

Again, neither of the two papers has been submitted to journal. 
We will wait until both papers get approval from STAR. 

If you have any further questions/comments, please let us know. 
If not, please also let us know if we can return the updates to starpapers-l.

Sincerely,
Yicheng for PAs
From: Star-gpc-355-l <star-gpc-355-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of Feng, Yicheng via Star-gpc-355-l <star-gpc-355-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2023 3:36 PM
To: James Dunlop <dunlop AT bnl.gov>
Cc: Feng, Yicheng <feng216 AT purdue.edu>; STAR GPC #355 <star-gpc-355-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: Re: [Star-gpc-355-l] Reply to institutional comments on the long paper for CME isobar baseline
 
---- External Email: Use caution with attachments, links, or sharing data ----

Hi Jamie, 

For your second question, the short paper has not been submitted to PRL yet. 
I am waiting for the long paper so that they can be submitted simultaneously.

Sincerely,
Yicheng
From: James Dunlop <dunlop AT bnl.gov>
Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2023 3:18 PM
To: Feng, Yicheng <feng216 AT purdue.edu>
Cc: James Dunlop <dunlop AT bnl.gov>; STAR GPC #355 <star-gpc-355-l AT lists.bnl.gov>; Wang, Fuqiang <fqwang AT purdue.edu>
Subject: Re: Reply to institutional comments on the long paper for CME isobar baseline
 
---- External Email: Use caution with attachments, links, or sharing data ----

Hi Yicheng,
  These look pretty non-controversial to me.  Others in the GPC?

The only thing that gives me pause is the comment from NISER, l. 440,
about identical figures.  This might be an issue, in that PRL now
has a policy (looks like it was updated in 2017) about joint submissions that 
"The longer manuscript should provide a substantially increased understanding of the subject while keeping the overlap of figures, tables, and text material to a minimum."

Is this really a minimum?  

Another question I have, actually, is have we lost the chance for joint submission, maybe this is
to Sooraj/management.  We won't have submitted these simultaneously, right?
 
"When authors submit simultaneously to Physical Review Letters and to Physical Review, the two manuscripts are reviewed coherently, typically by the same reviewers. If both papers receive favorable reviews, they are published together, unless simultaneous publication leads to undue delay for one of the papers."

--J

On Sep 20, 2023, at 9:45 AM, Feng, Yicheng <feng216 AT purdue.edu> wrote:

Hi GPC, 

We have got the comments on the long paper from SCSU, ACU, NISER, and IMP groups. 
We tried to reply to those comments and modify the paper draft accordingly.

The related files have been uploaded to drupal webpage:

If you have any further comments, please let me know. 

After you think it is ready, we can then return the updates to star-papers-l.

Sincerely,
Yicheng for the PAs

--
He/Him/His
Please do not feel obligated to respond to this message outside of your work hours.
James C Dunlop  Ph.: (631) 344-7781                       
Building 510A          Cell: (631)316-8153
P.O. Box 5000                      
Brookhaven National Laboratory
Upton, NY 11973

--
He/Him/His
Please do not feel obligated to respond to this message outside of your work hours.
James C Dunlop Ph.: (631) 344-7781                       
Building 510A         Cell: (631)316-8153
P.O. Box 5000                      
Brookhaven National Laboratory
Upton, NY 11973
dunlop AT bnl.gov










Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page