star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: STAR HardProbes PWG
List archive
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Monika Robotkova for ICHEP 2022 submitted for review
- From: Monika Robotková <robotmon AT fjfi.cvut.cz>
- To: "webmaster AT star.bnl.gov" <webmaster AT star.bnl.gov>, Nihar Sahoo <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>, STAR HardProbes PWG <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Subject: Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Monika Robotkova for ICHEP 2022 submitted for review
- Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 23:11:43 +0000
Hello Nihar,
Thank you for your useful comments, I've implemented them and uploaded v2 on Drupal page.
Best regards,
Monika
Od: Star-hp-l <star-hp-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov> za uživatele Nihar Sahoo via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Odesláno: 23. června 2022 12:58:10
Komu: webmaster AT star.bnl.gov; STAR HardProbes PWG
Předmět: Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Monika Robotkova for ICHEP 2022 submitted for review
Odesláno: 23. června 2022 12:58:10
Komu: webmaster AT star.bnl.gov; STAR HardProbes PWG
Předmět: Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Monika Robotkova for ICHEP 2022 submitted for review
Hello Monika,
Please find my comments below on your nice poster.
It is advised to follow the guidance set by IUPAC while using symbols in
scientific text:
https://iupac.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/ICTNS-On-the-use-of-italic-and-roman-fonts-for-symbols-in-scientific-text.pdf Note:
it should be written as $p$+$p$ and $p$+Au, etc, which is different from
the guidance.
For example:
pT,jet -> $p_{\rm T,jet}$ (here p represents momentum and it has value
so is italic; whereas "T,jet" is a label and no value so "roman")
Similarly please correct for z_g -> $z_{\rm g}$ and R_g -> $R_{\rm g}$
Detailed can be found in the above link.
In Abstract:
"…(Rg) and the QCD splitting…" -> "…(Rg), and the QCD splitting…"
"…second and third splits…" -> …second, and third splits…"
In Motivation:
_ Please make sure there is no extra space between words; may be due to
alignment.
_"…experimentally robust observables" -> "… robust observables."
(Observables are measured experimentally)
_ "Two ways how to study the parton shower: " - > "Two ways to study the
parton shower:"
In SoftDrop:
_Please use two bullets for "Grooming…" and "Connects…"
_Define z_cut, pT,1,2, theta and beta
_Introduce and define R_g here
Correlation between observes at the first split:
_Please use bullets for each items
_Define pT,jet
First, second, and third split:
_You need to introduce or show a cartoon to explain what are these
First, second, and third splits are
_Please use bullets for each items
Conclusion:
_Please use bullets for each items
_"Selecting on the split number as we move along the jet shower mimics
the same observation selecting on Rg at the first split"
-> can you please paraphrase this sentence? Not clear.
Regards,
Nihar
On 2022-06-22 17:41, webmaster--- via Star-hp-l wrote:
> Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>
> Monika Robotkova (robotmon AT fjfi.cvut.cz) has submitted a material for a
> review, please have a look:
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/60023
>
> ---
> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> _______________________________________________
> Star-hp-l mailing list
> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
Please find my comments below on your nice poster.
It is advised to follow the guidance set by IUPAC while using symbols in
scientific text:
https://iupac.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/ICTNS-On-the-use-of-italic-and-roman-fonts-for-symbols-in-scientific-text.pdf Note:
it should be written as $p$+$p$ and $p$+Au, etc, which is different from
the guidance.
For example:
pT,jet -> $p_{\rm T,jet}$ (here p represents momentum and it has value
so is italic; whereas "T,jet" is a label and no value so "roman")
Similarly please correct for z_g -> $z_{\rm g}$ and R_g -> $R_{\rm g}$
Detailed can be found in the above link.
In Abstract:
"…(Rg) and the QCD splitting…" -> "…(Rg), and the QCD splitting…"
"…second and third splits…" -> …second, and third splits…"
In Motivation:
_ Please make sure there is no extra space between words; may be due to
alignment.
_"…experimentally robust observables" -> "… robust observables."
(Observables are measured experimentally)
_ "Two ways how to study the parton shower: " - > "Two ways to study the
parton shower:"
In SoftDrop:
_Please use two bullets for "Grooming…" and "Connects…"
_Define z_cut, pT,1,2, theta and beta
_Introduce and define R_g here
Correlation between observes at the first split:
_Please use bullets for each items
_Define pT,jet
First, second, and third split:
_You need to introduce or show a cartoon to explain what are these
First, second, and third splits are
_Please use bullets for each items
Conclusion:
_Please use bullets for each items
_"Selecting on the split number as we move along the jet shower mimics
the same observation selecting on Rg at the first split"
-> can you please paraphrase this sentence? Not clear.
Regards,
Nihar
On 2022-06-22 17:41, webmaster--- via Star-hp-l wrote:
> Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>
> Monika Robotkova (robotmon AT fjfi.cvut.cz) has submitted a material for a
> review, please have a look:
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/60023
>
> ---
> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> _______________________________________________
> Star-hp-l mailing list
> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
-
[Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Monika Robotkova for ICHEP 2022 submitted for review,
webmaster, 06/22/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Monika Robotkova for ICHEP 2022 submitted for review,
Nihar Sahoo, 06/23/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Monika Robotkova for ICHEP 2022 submitted for review,
Monika Robotková, 06/23/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Monika Robotkova for ICHEP 2022 submitted for review,
Nihar Sahoo, 06/23/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Monika Robotkova for ICHEP 2022 submitted for review,
Barbara Trzeciak, 06/24/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Monika Robotkova for ICHEP 2022 submitted for review,
Monika Robotková, 06/25/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Monika Robotkova for ICHEP 2022 submitted for review,
Sooraj Radhakrishnan, 06/28/2022
- Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Monika Robotkova for ICHEP 2022 submitted for review, Monika Robotková, 06/28/2022
- Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Monika Robotkova for ICHEP 2022 submitted for review, Yi Yang, 06/30/2022
- Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Monika Robotkova for ICHEP 2022 submitted for review, Monika Robotková, 06/30/2022
- Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Monika Robotkova for ICHEP 2022 submitted for review, Yi Yang, 06/30/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Monika Robotkova for ICHEP 2022 submitted for review,
Sooraj Radhakrishnan, 06/28/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Monika Robotkova for ICHEP 2022 submitted for review,
Monika Robotková, 06/25/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Monika Robotkova for ICHEP 2022 submitted for review,
Barbara Trzeciak, 06/24/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Monika Robotkova for ICHEP 2022 submitted for review,
Nihar Sahoo, 06/23/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Monika Robotkova for ICHEP 2022 submitted for review,
Monika Robotková, 06/23/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Monika Robotkova for ICHEP 2022 submitted for review,
Nihar Sahoo, 06/23/2022
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.