STAR HardProbes PWG

[Sooraj Radhakrishnan <skradhakrishnan AT lbl.gov>]

Hi Diptanil,

    Thanks for preparing this nice abstract

Please find a few comments from me below

L8: Why is it qualitatively different from that of inclusive hadrons? The CMS D0 measurement is also showing a redistribution to higher radial distances, isnt? 

L10: signal significance 

L11: remove 'making STAR ideal for similar measurements'

L16: jet energy loss

thanks

Sooraj

On Sat, Jun 25, 2022 at 10:46 PM Diptanil Roy via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Hi Nihar, thank you for your comments, I have implemented most of them in the new version uploaded here. https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/APS2022_DiptanilRoy_v2.pdf

Please let me know if you have any more comments.

Thank you.

On Sat, Jun 25, 2022 at 12:29 PM Nihar Sahoo <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov> wrote:

Hello Diptanil,

I would suggest to submit your abstract based on QM2022 preliminary
results at DNP without promising a lot. I find your current preliminary
results are important and interesting to draw attention of the audience.

Besides, please find my comments on your nice abstract.

"Mentor: Dr. Sevil Salur" -> you can drop it, not required;
line#1 "Partons (quarks/gluons)… " -> "         Partons, i.e., quarks or
gluons, ….
Line#5"…quarks (such as charm and bottom) at low …" -> "…quarks, such as
charm and bottom, at low …"
Line#10 "…mesons at low with high significance, …" -> "…mesons at low
$p_{\rm T} with high significance of signal over the background."
You could drop "making STAR ideal for similar measurements."; this is
not required.

On second pare:
I would suggest to concentrate only on QM2022 results without promising
too much. As we have not seen D^0 lower pT results so far which may need
a detailed discussion. So please modify this para based on your QM2022
results (D^0 pT > 5 GeV) with existing STAR preliminary.

R_CP -> $R_{\rm CP}$  (here "CP" is a label and no value, so is roman)

Cheers
Nihar



On 2022-06-24 01:20, Diptanil Roy via Star-hp-l wrote:
> Hi everyone, please find my contribution for DNP 2022 in the link
> above. The abstract is more or less similar to the approved one for
> Quark Matter 2022, with some changes to reflect the already presented
> results. Thank you.
>
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 3:48 PM webmaster--- via Star-hp-l
> <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
>
>> Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>>
>> Diptanil Roy (roydiptanil AT gmail.com) has submitted a material for a
>> review,
>> please have a look:
>> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/60035
>>
>> ---
>> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
>> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
>> _______________________________________________
>> Star-hp-l mailing list
>> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
>
> --
>
> ~ Neil
> _______________________________________________
> Star-hp-l mailing list
> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l

--

~ Neil

_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l

--

Sooraj Radhakrishnan

Research Scientist,

Department of Physics

Kent State University

Kent, OH 44243

Physicist Postdoctoral Affiliate

Nuclear Science Division
Lawrence Berkeley National Lab
MS70R0319, One Cyclotron Road

Berkeley, CA 94720

Ph: 510-495-2473

Email: skradhakrishnan AT lbl.gov