STAR HardProbes PWG

[Nihar Sahoo <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Hello Diptanil,

Thank you for implementing my suggestions and modifying your abstract 
based on our current D^0+jet preliminary results.
Please find additional comments below and with implementing these I sign 
off.

Line1: "Partons i.e. quarks and gluons " -> "Parton, i.e, quark and 
gluons, …"
Line13:"…radial profile in anti-kT jets from Au+Au collisions …" -> 
"…radial profile in jets reconstructed using anti-kT in Au+Au 
collisions…"
"…200 GeV at RHIC, collected …" -> "…200 GeV collected…"

Cheers
Nihar


On 2022-06-25 22:43, Diptanil Roy wrote:
> Hi Nihar, thank you for your comments, I have implemented most of them
> in the new version uploaded here.
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/APS2022_DiptanilRoy_v2.pdf
>
> Please let me know if you have any more comments.
>
> Thank you.
>
> On Sat, Jun 25, 2022 at 12:29 PM Nihar Sahoo <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
> wrote:
>
> > Hello Diptanil,
> >
> > I would suggest to submit your abstract based on QM2022 preliminary
> > results at DNP without promising a lot. I find your current
> > preliminary
> > results are important and interesting to draw attention of the
> > audience.
> >
> > Besides, please find my comments on your nice abstract.
> >
> > "Mentor: Dr. Sevil Salur" -> you can drop it, not required;
> > line#1 "Partons (quarks/gluons)… " -> "         Partons, i.e.,
> > quarks or
> > gluons, ….
> > Line#5"…quarks (such as charm and bottom) at low …" ->
> > "…quarks, such as
> > charm and bottom, at low …"
> > Line#10 "…mesons at low with high significance, …" -> "…mesons
> > at low
> > $p_{\rm T} with high significance of signal over the background."
> > You could drop "making STAR ideal for similar measurements."; this
> > is
> > not required.
> >
> > On second pare:
> > I would suggest to concentrate only on QM2022 results without
> > promising
> > too much. As we have not seen D^0 lower pT results so far which may
> > need
> > a detailed discussion. So please modify this para based on your
> > QM2022
> > results (D^0 pT > 5 GeV) with existing STAR preliminary.
> >
> > R_CP -> $R_{\rm CP}$  (here "CP" is a label and no value, so is
> > roman)
> >
> > Cheers
> > Nihar
> >
> > On 2022-06-24 01:20, Diptanil Roy via Star-hp-l wrote:
> > > Hi everyone, please find my contribution for DNP 2022 in the link
> > > above. The abstract is more or less similar to the approved one
> > for
> > > Quark Matter 2022, with some changes to reflect the already
> > presented
> > > results. Thank you.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2022 at 3:48 PM webmaster--- via Star-hp-l
> > > <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> > > >
> > > > Diptanil Roy (roydiptanil AT gmail.com) has submitted a material for
> > a
> > > > review,
> > > > please have a look:
> > > > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/60035
> > > >
> > > > ---
> > > > If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> > > > webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Star-hp-l mailing list
> > > > Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > > > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > ~ Neil
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Star-hp-l mailing list
> > > Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
>
> --
>
> ~ Neil