star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: STAR HardProbes PWG
List archive
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Tristan Protzman for Hot Quarks 2022 submitted for review
- From: Nihar Sahoo <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
- To: Tristan Protzman <tlp220 AT lehigh.edu>
- Cc: STAR HardProbes PWG <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>, webmaster AT star.bnl.gov
- Subject: Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Tristan Protzman for Hot Quarks 2022 submitted for review
- Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 01:35:54 +0530
Hello Tristan,
I sign off.
Cheers
Nihar
On 2022-07-25 01:02, Tristan Protzman wrote:
Hello Nihar,
Thank you for your comments. I have adjusted the statements you
mentioned.
L16: v_{2}^{ch jet} -> v_{2}^{jet} [you don't need to mention "ch
jet"
as you have mentioned using "charged jet" in that sentence, this is
fine]
I would like to keep this as v_{2}^{ch jet}, both to stay consistent
with the ALICE result (1509.07334.pdf (arxiv.org) [1]) and because I
may in the future measure v_{2}^{jet} using full jets.
Cheers,
Tristan
On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 1:04 PM Nihar Sahoo <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
wrote:
Hello Tristan,
Please find my following suggestions.
L11: "…observables, including dihadron correlations and dijet
asymmetry." -> "…observables, such as dihadron correlations, dijet
asymmetry, etc.
"Another approach to measure jet quenching effects is to determine
the
anisotropy of the distribution of jets with respect to the event
plane."
I would suggest to modify your sentence like
"Nevertheless, the path length dependence of jet quenching can be
studied by measuring the anisotropy of the jet distributions with
respect to the event plane in heavy-ion collisions."
Then your next sentence "Due to the approximately elliptical …"
comes
coherently in a flow.
L16: v_{2}^{ch jet} -> v_{2}^{jet} [you don't need to mention "ch
jet"
as you have mentioned using "charged jet" in that sentence, this is
fine]
L17: "Zr+Zr systems."-> "Zr+Zr collision systems."
L19-21:"The EPD enables this measurement by allowing the event plane
to
be determined in the forward region, creating a gap in rapidity from
where jets are found which reduces autocorrelation effects with
respect
to the event plane determination."
-> I would rephrase this. "The EPD enables the determination of the
event plane in the forward rapidity, whereas jets are measured at
the
mid-rapidity that mitigates the autocorrelation to the jet
measurement
in STAR."
cheers
Nihar
On 2022-07-24 21:38, Tristan Protzman wrote:
Hello Nihar,implemented
Thank you for the helpful feedback on my abstract. I have
your suggested improvements, apart from the following:So it
L11: "Another approach to measuring jet quenching effects is to
determine the anisotropy of the distribution of jets…" This is
inaccurate, generally we don't measure jet v2 to study directly
jet-quenching effect rather it is the manifestation of jet-medium
interaction which gives jet-quenching effect and jet anisotropy.
needs some modification, Please rephrase this.the
Something like " The jet anisotropy measurement with respect to
event plane sheds light on the jet-medium interaction in heavy-ionthus
collisions."
My understanding is that the specific jet-medium response which is
probed by jet v2 is the path-length dependence of jet-quenching,
it would be valid to make the direct comparison. If this isprefer
inaccurate I would be happy to rephrase it, but if not I would
to keep it as is.HP-pwg.
An updated draft has been uploaded to Drupal.
Cheers,
Tristan
On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 5:09 AM Nihar Sahoo via Star-hp-l
<star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
Hello Tristan.
I request you to present your this new analysis regularly in
collimated
Please find my comments on your nice abstract.
L6: "...Early in the collision evolution,…" -> "...Early in the
collision,…"
L7: "… will produces …" -> "produces" ;
"…the QGP,.." -> "…the Quark-Gluon Plasma (QGP),…"
L8: "…fragment and hadronize to form a collimated collection of
final
state particle." -> …fragment, and hadronize to form a
"…collisionalspray
of final state particle."
L9-10: "…collisional and radiative processes." ->
Soand
radiative energy loss."
L10: observables, including -> observables including
L11: "Another approach to measuring jet quenching effects is to
determine the anisotropy of the distribution of jets…" This is
inaccurate, generally we don't measure jet v2 to study directly
jet-quenching effect rather it is the manifestation of jet-medium
interaction which gives jet-quenching effect and jet anisotropy.
theit
needs some modification, Please rephrase this.
Something like " The jet anisotropy measurement with respect to
heavy-ionevent plane sheds light on the jet-medium interaction in
forcollisions."
L13: "…elliptical shape of the QGP " -> "…elliptical shape of
the
initial geometry …"
L14: "…expect to measure more jets …" -> "…expect more
jets…"
L15: need to define v_2^{jet} and v_2^{ch jet}
L16: "…using track jets …" -> "…using charged jets.."
L17: " system, which are isobars of each other. " -> "…system."
Rest is
not needed.
Cheers
Nihar
On 2022-07-20 18:43, webmaster--- via Star-hp-l wrote:
Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
Tristan Protzman (tlp220 AT lehigh.edu) has submitted a material
a
review,_______________________________________________
please have a look:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/60350
---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
Links:
------
[1] https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://arxiv.org/pdf/1509.07334.pdf__;!!P4SdNyxKAPE!GJjIzld2oVkj9ODX0Yh1v-QJBKQ7HMiL19Yyy7l8l16bACiCAIcnX6btzZ16wFMxo6qe9VFUnZztgIN1_FI9Rw8$
-
[Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Tristan Protzman for Hot Quarks 2022 submitted for review,
webmaster, 07/20/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Tristan Protzman for Hot Quarks 2022 submitted for review,
Nihar Sahoo, 07/21/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Tristan Protzman for Hot Quarks 2022 submitted for review,
Tristan Protzman, 07/24/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Tristan Protzman for Hot Quarks 2022 submitted for review,
Nihar Sahoo, 07/24/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Tristan Protzman for Hot Quarks 2022 submitted for review,
Tristan Protzman, 07/24/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Tristan Protzman for Hot Quarks 2022 submitted for review,
Nihar Sahoo, 07/24/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Tristan Protzman for Hot Quarks 2022 submitted for review,
Tristan Protzman, 07/25/2022
- Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Tristan Protzman for Hot Quarks 2022 submitted for review, Barbara Trzeciak, 07/26/2022
- Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Tristan Protzman for Hot Quarks 2022 submitted for review, Yi Yang, 07/26/2022
- Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Tristan Protzman for Hot Quarks 2022 submitted for review, Tristan Protzman, 07/26/2022
- Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Tristan Protzman for Hot Quarks 2022 submitted for review, Tristan Protzman, 07/27/2022
- Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Tristan Protzman for Hot Quarks 2022 submitted for review, Yi Yang, 07/27/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Tristan Protzman for Hot Quarks 2022 submitted for review,
Tristan Protzman, 07/25/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Tristan Protzman for Hot Quarks 2022 submitted for review,
Nihar Sahoo, 07/24/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Tristan Protzman for Hot Quarks 2022 submitted for review,
Tristan Protzman, 07/24/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Tristan Protzman for Hot Quarks 2022 submitted for review,
Nihar Sahoo, 07/24/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Tristan Protzman for Hot Quarks 2022 submitted for review,
Tristan Protzman, 07/24/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Tristan Protzman for Hot Quarks 2022 submitted for review,
Nihar Sahoo, 07/21/2022
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.