STAR HardProbes PWG

[Yi Yang <yiyang0429 AT gmail.com>]

Hi Tristan,

I think I commented on the other thread, so just for the record that I don't have any further comments.

 

Cheers,

Yi

On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 10:50 PM Barbara Trzeciak via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Hi Tristan,

Nice abstract. I have minor suggestions for your consideration and sign off.

L1:  in Heavy Ion Collisions at STAR ->  in Isobar Collisions at sqrt{s_NN} = 200 GeV in STAR

L12: the anisotropy of the distribution -> the anisotropy of the transverse momentum distribution

L20: at forward rapidity -> you can add: with good resolution

Cheers,

Barbara

On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 8:47 PM Tristan Protzman via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Hello Nihar,

Thank you for your comments and signing off.

Cheers,

Tristan 

On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 4:05 PM Nihar Sahoo <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov> wrote:

Hello Tristan,

I sign off.

Cheers
Nihar

On 2022-07-25 01:02, Tristan Protzman wrote:
> Hello Nihar,
>
> Thank you for your comments.  I have adjusted the statements you
> mentioned.
>
> L16: v_{2}^{ch jet} -> v_{2}^{jet}  [you don't need to mention "ch
> jet"
> as you have mentioned using "charged jet" in that sentence, this is
> fine]
>
> I would like to keep this as v_{2}^{ch jet}, both to stay consistent
> with the ALICE result (1509.07334.pdf (arxiv.org) [1]) and because I
> may in the future measure v_{2}^{jet} using full jets.
>
> Cheers,
> Tristan
>
> On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 1:04 PM Nihar Sahoo <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello Tristan,
>>
>> Please find my following suggestions.
>>
>> L11: "…observables, including dihadron correlations and dijet
>> asymmetry." -> "…observables, such as dihadron correlations, dijet
>>
>> asymmetry, etc.
>>
>> "Another approach to  measure jet quenching effects is to determine
>> the
>> anisotropy of the distribution of jets with respect to the event
>> plane."
>> I would suggest to modify your sentence like
>> "Nevertheless, the path length dependence of jet quenching can be
>> studied by measuring the anisotropy of the jet distributions with
>> respect to the event plane in heavy-ion collisions."
>> Then your next sentence "Due to the approximately elliptical …"
>> comes
>> coherently in a flow.
>>
>> L16: v_{2}^{ch jet} -> v_{2}^{jet}  [you don't need to mention "ch
>> jet"
>> as you have mentioned using "charged jet" in that sentence, this is
>> fine]
>>
>> L17: "Zr+Zr systems."-> "Zr+Zr collision systems."
>>
>> L19-21:"The EPD enables this measurement by allowing the event plane
>> to
>> be determined in the forward region, creating a gap in rapidity from
>>
>> where jets are found which  reduces autocorrelation effects with
>> respect
>> to the event plane determination."
>> -> I would rephrase this.  "The EPD enables the determination of the
>>
>> event plane in the forward rapidity, whereas jets are measured at
>> the
>> mid-rapidity that mitigates the autocorrelation to the jet
>> measurement
>> in STAR."
>>
>> cheers
>> Nihar
>>
>> On 2022-07-24 21:38, Tristan Protzman wrote:
>>> Hello Nihar,
>>>
>>> Thank you for the helpful feedback on my abstract.  I have
>> implemented
>>> your suggested improvements, apart from the following:
>>>
>>> L11: "Another approach to measuring jet quenching effects is to
>>> determine the anisotropy of the distribution of jets…" This is
>>> inaccurate, generally we don't measure jet v2 to study directly
>>> jet-quenching effect rather it is the manifestation of jet-medium
>>> interaction which gives jet-quenching effect and jet anisotropy.
>> So it
>>> needs some modification, Please rephrase this.
>>> Something like " The jet anisotropy measurement with respect to
>> the
>>> event plane sheds light on the jet-medium interaction in heavy-ion
>>> collisions."
>>>
>>> My understanding is that the specific jet-medium response which is
>>> probed by jet v2 is the path-length dependence of jet-quenching,
>> thus
>>> it would be valid to make the direct comparison.  If this is
>>> inaccurate I would be happy to rephrase it, but if not I would
>> prefer
>>> to keep it as is.
>>>
>>> An updated draft has been uploaded to Drupal.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Tristan
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 21, 2022 at 5:09 AM Nihar Sahoo via Star-hp-l
>>> <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello Tristan.
>>>>
>>>> I request you to present your this new analysis regularly in
>> HP-pwg.
>>>>
>>>> Please find my comments on your nice abstract.
>>>>
>>>> L6: "...Early in the collision evolution,…" -> "...Early in the
>>>> collision,…"
>>>> L7: "…  will produces …" -> "produces" ;
>>>> "…the QGP,.." -> "…the Quark-Gluon Plasma (QGP),…"
>>>> L8: "…fragment and hadronize to form a collimated collection of
>>>> final
>>>> state particle." -> …fragment, and hadronize to form a
>> collimated
>>>> spray
>>>> of final state particle."
>>>> L9-10: "…collisional  and radiative processes." ->
>> "…collisional
>>>> and
>>>> radiative energy loss."
>>>> L10: observables, including -> observables including
>>>> L11: "Another approach to measuring jet quenching effects is to
>>>> determine the anisotropy of the distribution of jets…" This is
>>>> inaccurate, generally we don't measure jet v2 to study directly
>>>> jet-quenching effect rather it is the manifestation of jet-medium
>>>> interaction which gives jet-quenching effect and jet anisotropy.
>> So
>>>> it
>>>> needs some modification, Please rephrase this.
>>>> Something like " The jet anisotropy measurement with respect to
>> the
>>>> event plane sheds light on the jet-medium interaction in
>> heavy-ion
>>>> collisions."
>>>> L13: "…elliptical shape of the QGP " -> "…elliptical shape of
>>>> the
>>>> initial geometry …"
>>>> L14: "…expect to measure more jets …" -> "…expect more
>>>> jets…"
>>>> L15: need to define  v_2^{jet} and v_2^{ch jet}
>>>> L16: "…using track jets …" -> "…using charged jets.."
>>>> L17: " system, which are isobars of each other. " -> "…system."
>>>> Rest is
>>>> not needed.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>> Nihar
>>>>
>>>> On 2022-07-20 18:43, webmaster--- via Star-hp-l wrote:
>>>>> Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>>>>>
>>>>> Tristan Protzman (tlp220 AT lehigh.edu) has submitted a material
>> for
>>>> a
>>>>> review,
>>>>> please have a look:
>>>>> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/60350
>>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
>>>>> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Star-hp-l mailing list
>>>>> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>>>>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Star-hp-l mailing list
>>>> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>>>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
>
>
> Links:
> ------
> [1]
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://arxiv.org/pdf/1509.07334.pdf__;!!P4SdNyxKAPE!GJjIzld2oVkj9ODX0Yh1v-QJBKQ7HMiL19Yyy7l8l16bACiCAIcnX6btzZ16wFMxo6qe9VFUnZztgIN1_FI9Rw8$

_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l

_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l