STAR HardProbes PWG

[Barbara Trzeciak <barbara.trzeciak AT gmail.com>]

Hi Tanmay,

thanks for the update, the current content looks better to me.

Please see below my comments.

- Add STAR to the tile 

- Remove the in-line references

- L7:  relative to vacuum or a pp collision baseline. ->  relative to vacuum (pp collisions) baseline.

- L11-16: "Previous results from the CMS experiment ... towards quark-like fragmentation of jets in presence of a medium" ->   LHC results showed medium-induced modification of jet shape distributions and bias towards quark-like fragmentation of jets.

- L17: what do you mean by "different population" ?

- L19-20: We present results fully corrected for detector effects rho(r) observable -> In this talk, we will present measurements of the fully corrected rho(r) observable 

- L22: remove "initial"

- L23: observables from 200 GeV STAR Au-Au collisions -> observables in Au+Au collisions. 

- L24-25: I would remove the last sentence "Comparisons of results ... "

Cheers,

Barbara

On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 7:23 PM Tanmay Pani <tanmay.pani.rutgers AT gmail.com> wrote:

I have tried to address your concerns and uploaded the new version of the abstract here: 

https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/TP_HP_abstract_v5.pdf

Please let me know of any comments or questions

Thanks

Tanmay

On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 11:39 AM Barbara Trzeciak <barbara.trzeciak AT gmail.com> wrote:

Ok, now I get.

Please make it more clear (specific) in the abstract then.

Cheers, 

Barbara 

On Mon, 28 Nov 2022, 17:37 Tanmay Pani, <tanmay.pani.rutgers AT gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Barbara,

Differential jet shape is the \rho(r) variable which shows the distribution of charged particle momentum wrt the jet axis. Our postdoc Joel Mazer showed the preliminaries for the uncorrected results in hard probes 2020. Since I joined rutgers in 2020 we have been working on the corrections to that using dijet embedding. Please refer to Joel’s talk from hard probes 2020 (slides 9-12), for further clarification on this analysis: 

https://indico.cern.ch/event/751767/contributions/3771155/attachments/2048465/3432798/HardProbes2020_JetShapeFF_JoelMazer.pdf

PtD, lesub and girth variables are a separate analysis that I have taken over this year. 

I intend to update Hard probes pwg on the differential jet shapes analysis this week.

Please let me know if you have any questions or comments

Thanks,

Tanmay

On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 11:08 AM Barbara Trzeciak <barbara.trzeciak AT gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Tanmay,

I'm bit confused. Which differential jet shape observables fully corrected do you promise for both pp and Au+Au ? I thought we're talking here about Girth, p D T and LeSub. But now in one sentence you say fully corrected in both systems, in the next sentence says that the results are fully corrected only in pp.

Cheers,

Barbara

On Sun, Nov 27, 2022 at 8:32 PM Tanmay Pani <tanmay.pani.rutgers AT gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Barbara and Nihar,

Thanks for your comments. We have the fully corrected results (corrections applied from the dijet embedding) of differential jet shapes ready for both pp and AuAu, which I will be presenting the coming Thursday to hard probes. However for PtD, LeSub and Girth observables I can promise only pp results fully corrected for now, so I have changed the abstract accordingly.  Please have a look at the updated version and let me know of your comments.

TP_HP_abstract_v4.pdf

Thanks,

Tanmay

On Sun, Nov 27, 2022 at 10:40 AM Barbara Trzeciak <barbara.trzeciak AT gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Tanmay, 

I would suggest sticking to p+p results.

Corrections for Au+Au will be more challenging, and you're still investigating the p+p case.

I think it's better to say that you will show some exploratory studies for Au+Au, not to over promise. 

Cheers,

Barbara

On Sun, Nov 27, 2022 at 12:29 PM Nihar Sahoo via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Hello Tanmay,

As we discussed at last HP-pwg meeting,
Are you planning to present both pp and AuAu jet shape observables?
and do you think it is feasible to prepare both pp and AuAu results in
HP2023 timeline?

Please let us know that will help us to give a shape your abstract.

Thank you
Nihar

On 2022-11-22 03:03, Tanmay Pani via Star-hp-l wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Please find my abstract submission for HP2023 here:
>
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/TP_HP_abstract_v3.pdf
>
> Looking forwards to comments and suggestions,
>
> Tanmay
>
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 4:32 PM webmaster--- via Star-hp-l
> <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
>
>> Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>>
>> Tanmay Pani (tp543 AT physics.rutgers.edu) has submitted a material for
>> a
>> review, please have a look:
>> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/61810
>>
>> Deadline: 2022-12-05
>> ---
>> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
>> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
>> _______________________________________________
>> Star-hp-l mailing list
>> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
> _______________________________________________
> Star-hp-l mailing list
> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l