Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-hp-l - Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Nihar Sahoo for IS 2023 submitted for review

star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR HardProbes PWG

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Nihar Sahoo <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
  • To: Yi Yang <yiyang0429 AT gmail.com>, STAR HardProbes PWG <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Cc: webmaster AT star.bnl.gov
  • Subject: Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Nihar Sahoo for IS 2023 submitted for review
  • Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 10:40:40 +0530

Hello Barbara and Yi,

Thank you for your comments.
Although, I am not sure if the revised abstract (v2) is needed in this case as probably Rongrong has submitted the abstract already.

https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/2023/Measurement-Jet-substructure-pp-and-event-activity-pAu-collisions-sqrts200-GeV-ST

But I implemented your some of your comments and my reply can be found below.

On Barbara's comments:
- L5-6: The vacuum parton shower converts into a collimated spray of hadrons—known as a jet—in p+p collisions -> (this sentence doesn't read well, maybe something like) Jets are collimated sprays of final-state particles produced from initial hard scatterings of partons in p+p collisions.

I still think that sentence is nice but I tried to modify a bit now.

- L10: jet mass, jet charge -> jet mass or jet charge
"or" is incorrect as we are showing both.
"," is needed.

- L12: Correlator -> Correlator (EEC)
Abbreviation is not needed because I am not going to use anywhere next in this abstract.

- L19: In this talk, we plan to present -> In this talk, we present. And I would start a new paragraph here.
Done
- L19: on these observables -> on ensemble level and jet-by-jet correlations between substructure variables and fully corrected EEC
This sounds more complicated. I tried to rephrase that sentence.

- L22: On the other hand, we also -> We also
Done
- L20: √s=200 -> √s = 200 (missing spaces), also in L24 and 26
Done
- L25: the nuclear -> the cold nuclear
Done

On Yi's comment:

I have some minor comments for your consideration:
* I would add one sentence somewhere in the first paragraph stating
that using p+p and p+Au can provide some information about the initial
state (cold nuclear effect).
Done
- L5: -- known as a jet -- --> , known as a jet,
Done
- L19: In this talk... --> move to the next paragraph
DOne
- L19: "we plan to present" seems to be a bit odd, suggest to "we
present"
Done

Thank you
Nihar


On 2023-03-13 08:04, Yi Yang via Star-hp-l wrote:
Hi Nihar,

Thanks a lot for preparing the nice abstract.
I have some minor comments for your consideration:
* I would add one sentence somewhere in the first paragraph stating
that using p+p and p+Au can provide some information about the initial
state (cold nuclear effect).
- L5: -- known as a jet -- --> , known as a jet,
- L19: In this talk... --> move to the next paragraph
- L19: "we plan to present" seems to be a bit odd, suggest to "we
present"

Cheers,
Yi

On Sun, Mar 12, 2023 at 3:04 AM webmaster--- via Star-hp-l
<star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,

Nihar Sahoo (nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov) has submitted a material for a
review,
please have a look:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/62933

Deadline: 2023-03-10
---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page