Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-hp-l - Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Youqi Song for BOOST 2023 submitted for review

star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR HardProbes PWG

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Nihar Sahoo <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
  • To: Youqi Song <youqi.song AT yale.edu>, STAR HardProbes PWG <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Youqi Song for BOOST 2023 submitted for review
  • Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2023 19:05:54 +0530

Hello Youqi,

Thank your for your nice slides on jet substructure measurement.

Please find my comment below.

Slide4: "... and in a" -> Not sure if it has any meaning.
References are too small to see. For example "STAR. DIS 2021"

Make "CollinearDrop" consistent everywhere, Some places you write "collinear drop". Please check this out.

Slide14:
"Jets with a more DGLAP-like splitting are more likely to have small early-stage radiation" -> where did you discuss about "DGLAP"? I could not find.

Slide16: "this is a fake jet" -> "fake jet" is not a correct phrase this context. You could use something else like "unused jets" . These are true jet but you are not using in your r_c observable.

Slide17:
"..have a unique sensitivity for non-perturbative effects" -> Trying to understand what exactly you want to say here.
This slide you may end up with some open questions or a bit generic. Up to you.


Cheers
Nihar


On 2023-07-19 01:41, Youqi Song via Star-hp-l wrote:
Hi Isaac,

Thanks for the comments and reminders! I have uploaded a new version
of slides on drupal.

Best,
Youqi

On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 6:04 PM Mooney, Isaac via Star-hp-l
<star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Hi Youqi,

It looks like you addressed my comments from today’s institutional
practice, so I only have a few remaining ones. With these
implemented, I sign off.

Enjoy Berkeley!
-Isaac

5. If you plan to say it verbally, then no need to add it as text,
but it should be explained that a trivial weaker zcut is justified
because the UE contribution to jets in pp is small.

9. I still think "MultiFold result" and "RooUnfold result" are
strange constructions. These are physics results, not results on the
correction method. So “RooUnfolded/MultiFolded result” would be
fine, similar to what you have at the bottom of the slide.

15. If you don’t get the Herwig before the talk, don’t forget to
remove it from the plot.

16. “fluctuation”; “neutral energy measurement for jet p_T
below 20 GeV”; This “(smaller effect)” is also probably a
distraction from the discussion you want to have and could be
removed. I’ll leave it up to you.

On Jul 17, 2023, at 3:45 PM, webmaster--- via Star-hp-l
<star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,

Youqi Song (youqi.song AT yale.edu) has submitted a material for a
review,
please have a look:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/64330

Deadline: 2023-07-31
---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
webmaster@http://www.star.bnl.gov/
_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l

_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page