Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-hp-l - Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Youqi Song for BOOST 2023 submitted for review

star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR HardProbes PWG

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Youqi Song <youqi.song AT yale.edu>
  • To: Nihar Sahoo <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
  • Cc: STAR HardProbes PWG <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Youqi Song for BOOST 2023 submitted for review
  • Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2023 15:34:51 -0400

Hi Nihar,

Thanks for the comments. I have implemented them and uploaded a new version on drupal.

Slide4: "... and in a" -> Not sure if it has any meaning.
Here I am trying to emphasize that the two measurements shown on this slide are multi-differential measurements, as opposed to the inclusive measurements shown on slide 3.

Slide16: "this is a fake jet" -> "fake jet" is not a correct phrase this
context. You could use something else like "unused jets" . These are
true jet but you are not using in your r_c observable.
I still think this jet should be considered "fake" for the purpose of this analysis. The jet shouldn’t be included for rc analysis since at truth level, one of its leading dihadrons is a neutral particle. However, we won't be able to know that from data, so it ends up being incorrectly included for the analysis. I have added a sentence to explain this on the slide as well.

Best,
Youqi

On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 9:35 AM Nihar Sahoo <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov> wrote:
Hello Youqi,

Thank your for your nice slides on jet substructure measurement.

Please find my comment below.

Slide4: "... and in a" -> Not sure if it has any meaning.
References are too small to see. For example "STAR. DIS 2021"

Make "CollinearDrop" consistent everywhere, Some places you write
"collinear drop". Please check this out.

Slide14:
"Jets with a more DGLAP-like splitting are more likely to have small
early-stage radiation" -> where did you discuss about "DGLAP"?  I could
not find.

Slide16: "this is a fake jet" -> "fake jet" is not a correct phrase this
context. You could use something else like "unused jets" . These are
true jet but you are not using in your r_c observable.

Slide17:
"..have a unique sensitivity for non-perturbative effects"  -> Trying to
understand what exactly you want to say here.
This slide you may end up with some open questions or a bit generic. Up
to you.


Cheers
Nihar


On 2023-07-19 01:41, Youqi Song via Star-hp-l wrote:
> Hi Isaac,
>
> Thanks for the comments and reminders! I have uploaded a new version
> of slides on drupal.
>
> Best,
> Youqi
>
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 6:04 PM Mooney, Isaac via Star-hp-l
> <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
>
>> Hi Youqi,
>>
>> It looks like you addressed my comments from today’s institutional
>> practice, so I only have a few remaining ones. With these
>> implemented, I sign off.
>>
>> Enjoy Berkeley!
>> -Isaac
>>
>> 5. If you plan to say it verbally, then no need to add it as text,
>> but it should be explained that a trivial weaker zcut is justified
>> because the UE contribution to jets in pp is small.
>>
>> 9. I still think "MultiFold result" and "RooUnfold result" are
>> strange constructions. These are physics results, not results on the
>> correction method. So “RooUnfolded/MultiFolded result” would be
>> fine, similar to what you have at the bottom of the slide.
>>
>> 15. If you don’t get the Herwig before the talk, don’t forget to
>> remove it from the plot.
>>
>> 16. “fluctuation”; “neutral energy measurement for jet p_T
>> below 20 GeV”; This “(smaller effect)” is also probably a
>> distraction from the discussion you want to have and could be
>> removed. I’ll leave it up to you.
>>
>>> On Jul 17, 2023, at 3:45 PM, webmaster--- via Star-hp-l
>> <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>>>
>>> Youqi Song (youqi.song AT yale.edu) has submitted a material for a
>> review,
>>> please have a look:
>>> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/64330
>>>
>>> Deadline: 2023-07-31
>>> ---
>>> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
>>> webmaster@http://www.star.bnl.gov/
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Star-hp-l mailing list
>>> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Star-hp-l mailing list
>> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
> _______________________________________________
> Star-hp-l mailing list
> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page