STAR HardProbes PWG

[Youqi Song <youqi.song AT yale.edu>]

Hi Nihar,

Thanks for the comments! Please see my updated poster on drupal and find my response below.

Best,

Youqi

_ "Rc = -0.2, Negative 𝒓𝒄 reveals that there is influence from jet
charge ~ 0 on average." -> Not sure how do you conclude this one? Why
rc=-0.2 is interesting?

After discussing this more with Helen, we think it would be good to include the data points for these random pairs here as well, to support the values of -0.2. These are the black points in slide 25 of https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/prelim_request_082223.pdf, and I will update my preliminary request slides soon to include these points as well. These values are worth mentioning since they are less than zero, meaning that even when we look at random pairs, opposite sign configuration is still more preferred than the same sign configuration, which has influence from jet charge ~ 0 (or in other words, local charge conservation). I have also weakened the statement from "there is influence" to "there remains some influence".

_ In summary, you could also mention that you plan to measure rc
observables as function of formation time as it has been done in H1
analysis.

I added this in the outlook section.

Outlook:
_ "Using iterative declustering technique, we can connects hadrons back
to the resolved splitting at parton level!"
Can we do it? Not sure.

I changed the wording to "we could potentially ...".

And please try to make your text size uniform. Some places they are very
small and large.

I have tried to unified the color coding a bit, but would like to keep my current choice of font sizes, if possible. I have the largest font size for physics messages and the abstract, smallest font size for references (I've also checked that they would be legible when printed on a poster), and medium font size for the rest.

On Sun, Aug 27, 2023 at 11:40 PM Nihar Sahoo <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov> wrote:

Hello Youqi,

Most of your poster contents are from your previous DIS23 talks, so they
are in good shape.

Please find my additional comments on your r_c observables.

r_c Results block:

_ "Rc = -0.2, Negative 𝒓𝒄 reveals that there is influence from jet
charge ~ 0 on average." -> Not sure how do you conclude this one? Why
rc=-0.2 is interesting?

_ In summary, you could also mention that you plan to measure rc
observables as function of formation time as it has been done in H1
analysis.

Outlook:
_ "Using iterative declustering technique, we can connects hadrons back
to the resolved splitting at parton level!"
Can we do it? Not sure.


And please try to make your text size uniform. Some places they are very
small and large.

With these implemented I sign off.

Cheers
Nihar

On 2023-08-23 05:05, Youqi Song via Star-hp-l wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to acknowledge that my rc plot hasn't been officially
> approved yet, so please treat the rc figure in this poster draft as a
> placeholder for now. Thank you.
>
> Best,
> Youqi
>
> On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 7:24 PM webmaster--- via Star-hp-l
> <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
>
>> Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>>
>> Youqi Song (youqi.song AT yale.edu) has submitted a material for a
>> review,
>> please have a look:
>> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/64818
>>
>> Deadline: 2023-09-03
>> ---
>> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
>> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
>> _______________________________________________
>> Star-hp-l mailing list
>> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
> _______________________________________________
> Star-hp-l mailing list
> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l