Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-hp-l - Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Yan Wang for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review

star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR HardProbes PWG

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: wy157543 AT mail.ustc.edu.cn
  • To: "STAR HardProbes PWG" <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Yan Wang for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review
  • Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2023 21:19:25 +0800 (GMT+08:00)

Hi all,

Thank you for your nice comments, The new version can be found at
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/64965

best,
Yan


-----原始邮件-----
发件人:EsumiShinIchi <esumi.shinichi.gn AT u.tsukuba.ac.jp>
发送时间:2023-09-02 03:16:52 (星期六)
收件人: "STAR HardProbes PWG" <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
抄送: "wy157543 AT mail.ustc.edu.cn" <wy157543 AT mail.ustc.edu.cn>
主题: Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Yan Wang for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review

Dear Yan
I copied a comment from the google doc for your presentation 
on J/psi RAA energy dependence including SPS and LHC shown 
in the rehearsal today. 
Best regards, ShinIchi

S7: Legend missing for 62GeV
Why is it red for 54GeV? (add “preliminary”)
      17.3, 200, 5020 -> 17.3, 2760, 5020 GeV for Pb+Pb

2023/08/31 12:32、Barbara Trzeciak via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>のメール:

Hi Yan,

very nice slides.
I propose to use a log scale for the x-axis on the right plot on slide 5 - energy dependence of J/psi RAA vs Npart.
It should be easier to distinguish low Npart points, as for the colliding system scan on slide 8.
I also suggest to highlight in some color bullet points with important physics messages, that we want to highlight. 

Cheers,
Barbara

On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 9:21 PM Yi Yang via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
Hi Yan,

Thanks a lot for the nice slides. I have some comments on v3 for your consideration. 
 - General: I would replace all "isobar" or "isobaric" to "Zr+Zr & Ru+Ru". 
 - p4: I remember we used 4B isobar data before, right?  
 - p7: Please indicate BHT2 is the new result for QM
 - p11: I don't think that we can say "Centrality dependence trend seems be closer to that at SPS than at LHC" with current statistics. Should we just say "They have similar centrality dependence"? 
 - p12: Second bullet, can you calculate the significance? It looks like a 2-3 sigma effect... 
 - p13: It would be good to show the Upsilon mass spectra from isobar data here. 
 - p14 -15: I would move J/psi polarization before the Upsilon results. I understand you want to separate them by physics topic, so it is up to you. 
 - p16: The ordering should be the same in your presentation, first talk about the J/psi in BES-II, then results from isobar. 
 - p17: run23-25 --> run 23-25

Cheers,
Yi

 

On Sun, Aug 27, 2023 at 1:56 PM webmaster--- via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,

Yan Wang (wy157543 AT mail.ustc.edu.cn) has submitted a material for a review, 
please have a look:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/64965

Deadline: 2023-09-03
---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact 
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page