STAR HardProbes PWG

[Nihar Sahoo <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Hello Yuan,

Your current version looks good now.

I have one comment on your slide3 and 10,
Slide 10 figure has theory curves starting from pT > 4 GeV.
Is there any reason for this change? Whereas you have plot with AuAu 
theory curves up to 0 GeV.

 Probably I missed this discussion.

Cheers
Nihar



On 2023-08-30 03:46, suyuann AT mail.ustc.edu.cn wrote:
> Dear Nihar,
>  Thank you for your nice comments. I’ve implemented all of them,
> please find the updated version here:
>  https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/QM_2023_0829.pdf
>
> Best regards,
> Yuan
>
> > -----Original Messages-----
> > From: "Nihar Sahoo via Star-hp-l" <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
> > Sent Time: 2023-08-28 15:51:54 (Monday)
> > To: "STAR HardProbes PWG" <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
> > Cc: "Nihar Sahoo" <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>, webmaster AT star.bnl.gov
> > Subject: Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Yuan Su for Quark Matter 
> > 2023 submitted for review
> >
> > Dear Yuan,
> >
> > Thank you for posting your nice slides.
> > I have following comments on your slides.
> >
> > No need to make text as red color for your interest.
> >
> > Slide 3:
> > _ "A significant energy loss of charm quarks in isobar collisions?" ->
> > sounds like you have already know the conclusion.
> >
> >     How about combing last two bullets
> > "What is the charge quark energy loss and binary collision scaling in
> > Isobar collisions?"
> >
> > Slide4:
> >
> > _ Title: Charm jets tagged with D^0 mesons -> Simply  " D^0 tagged jet
> > in heavy-ion collisions"
> >
> > _ Definition of Z; please check with what Diptanil has used in his
> > poster. Use the same notations.
> >
> > _ "A significant suppression of D0 tagged jet yield with lower D0
> > kinematics at RHIC energies? " -> Remove this bullet. Not needed to 
> > say
> > anything.
> >
> > _ Make "radial distribution of the D^0" expression a bit bigger and 
> > move
> > it up so that people can see from distance.
> >
> > Slide5:
> > "A diffusion of charm quarks at lower pT in Au+Au collisions at sNN =
> > 200 GeV?" -> It is not clear where do you get it. I think it is not
> > needed. Just go to your results in 15min talk. In QM, people want to 
> > see
> > the results assuming they are aware of motivation.
> >
> > _"Contribution from the underlying background is small at RHIC" This 
> > is
> > not absolutely correct. And not clear what underlying background you 
> > are
> > talking. So better to remove or rephrase this.
> >
> > _In this slide important is to highlight the kienematic range of D^0
> > that you are going to show: 1 - 10 GeV/c; That you mentioned at the
> > bottom that no one will notice. Make it bigger and highlight somewhere
> > up.
> >
> > Slide7:
> > combination background -> combinatoric background
> >
> >
> > Slide8:
> > _Suggestion: Less wording is better. Try to clean it up and make a
> > concise phrase or sentence
> > _ VS -> vs [and elsewhere]
> >
> >
> > You can bring slide4 and 5 before Slide12, so that you can tell people
> > what you are going to tell next.
> > Make 1-10 GeV/c kinematic slide in bold text on each slides.
> >
> > Slide12:
> > I hope you will speak a sentence on "LIDO" comparison .
> >
> > Cheers
> > Nihar
> >
> >
> > On 2023-08-28 10:53, webmaster--- via Star-hp-l wrote:
> > > Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> > >
> > > Yuan Su (suyuann AT mail.ustc.edu.cn) has submitted a material for a
> > > review,
> > > please have a look:
> > > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/64968
> > >
> > > Deadline: 2023-09-03
> > > ---
> > > If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> > > webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Star-hp-l mailing list
> > > Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
> > _______________________________________________
> > Star-hp-l mailing list
> > Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l