STAR HardProbes PWG

["Ma, Rongrong" <marr AT bnl.gov>]

Hello Yuan

Very nice slides. I have some comments for your considerations: 

s4
- remove "QM 2022, Tong Liu" (Your talk is a STAR talk, so you do not need to 
cite another STAR talk.)

s5
- PID power -> PID reach

s8
- in the same centrality within uncertainties 
- Right figure: change "central" to "0-10%" (if this is true) in the legend

s9
- with those in Au+Au within uncertainties

s10
- include collisional and radiative energy losses are

s13
- Suppression of D0 meson tagged jet yield -> Hint of D0 tagged jet 
suppression 
- The reference for LIDO is wrong. It should be: PRC 98 064901. (Fix this on 
other slides)

s15
- LIDO model (MPI=off) describes the ratio of radial profile in data

s16
- D0 behaves -> D0 seems to behave
- Suppression of D0 jet yield -> Hint of D0 jet suppression
- LIDO model underpredicts yield suppression in central collisions, but can 
describe radial profile ratio between central and peripheral collisions

s20
- I suggest to replace the right figure with the one for D0 Raa vs. Npart

Best
Rongrong


> On Sep 3, 2023, at 2:05 PM, suyuann--- via Star-hp-l 
> <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
> 
> Hi Isaac,
> Thank you for your nice comments. I’ve implemented all of them, 
> 2. thanks for concretization
> 3. I've tune the plots on page 3, 6, 7
> 6. a arrow and box are added, mixed event is used
> 7. (slope of T_eff) is added; and Teff consistent with each other is fit 
> result, and a strong conclusion may need strangeness hadron fitting in 
> Isobar, we may can try it later; I've redrawn it and the plot has made the 
> canvas closer to the dimensions
> 13. "which considering heavy quark evolution in medium with collisional and 
> radiative energy losses" is added
> 14. done
> 16. Ok and planning to verbally elaborate a bit here
> please find the updated version in the drupal or the following link:
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/QM_09032023_YuanSu.pdf
> 
> Best regards,
> Yuan
> 
> 
>> -----Original Messages-----
>> From: "suyuann--- via Star-hp-l" <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
>> Sent Time: 2023-09-03 23:10:30 (Sunday)
>> To: "Nihar Sahoo" <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
>> Cc: suyuann AT mail.ustc.edu.cn, "STAR HardProbes PWG" 
>> <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>, webmaster AT star.bnl.gov
>> Subject: Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Yuan Su for Quark Matter 
>> 2023 submitted for review
>> 
>> Hi Nihar,
>>  Thanks for your the comment. The total number of charm is conserved. The 
>> enhancement of Lambda_c and Ds have been observed in AuAu collisions. That 
>> means more charm quarks are used to form Lambda_c and Ds, then less charm 
>> will be used for D0. This charm hadronization mechanism is consistent with 
>> a suppression of D0 yield at low pt. But the model doesn't include this 
>> charm hadrochemistry. so now we focus on the high p_T process.
>> 
>> Best regrads,
>> Yuan
>> 
>> 
>>> -----Original Messages-----
>>> From: "Nihar Sahoo" <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
>>> Sent Time: 2023-09-03 18:13:50 (Sunday)
>>> To: suyuann AT mail.ustc.edu.cn
>>> Cc: "STAR HardProbes PWG" <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>, 
>>> webmaster AT star.bnl.gov
>>> Subject: Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Yuan Su for Quark Matter 
>>> 2023 submitted for review
>>> 
>>> Hello Yuan,
>>> 
>>> Your current version looks good now.
>>> 
>>> I have one comment on your slide3 and 10,
>>> Slide 10 figure has theory curves starting from pT > 4 GeV.
>>> Is there any reason for this change? Whereas you have plot with AuAu 
>>> theory curves up to 0 GeV.
>>> 
>>>  Probably I missed this discussion.
>>> 
>>> Cheers
>>> Nihar
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 2023-08-30 03:46, suyuann AT mail.ustc.edu.cn wrote:
>>>> Dear Nihar,
>>>> Thank you for your nice comments. I’ve implemented all of them,
>>>> please find the updated version here:
>>>> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/QM_2023_0829.pdf
>>>> 
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Yuan
>>>> 
>>>>> -----Original Messages-----
>>>>> From: "Nihar Sahoo via Star-hp-l" <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
>>>>> Sent Time: 2023-08-28 15:51:54 (Monday)
>>>>> To: "STAR HardProbes PWG" <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
>>>>> Cc: "Nihar Sahoo" <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>, webmaster AT star.bnl.gov
>>>>> Subject: Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Yuan Su for Quark Matter 
>>>>> 2023 submitted for review
>>>>> 
>>>>> Dear Yuan,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thank you for posting your nice slides.
>>>>> I have following comments on your slides.
>>>>> 
>>>>> No need to make text as red color for your interest.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Slide 3:
>>>>> _ "A significant energy loss of charm quarks in isobar collisions?" ->
>>>>> sounds like you have already know the conclusion.
>>>>> 
>>>>>    How about combing last two bullets
>>>>> "What is the charge quark energy loss and binary collision scaling in
>>>>> Isobar collisions?"
>>>>> 
>>>>> Slide4:
>>>>> 
>>>>> _ Title: Charm jets tagged with D^0 mesons -> Simply  " D^0 tagged jet
>>>>> in heavy-ion collisions"
>>>>> 
>>>>> _ Definition of Z; please check with what Diptanil has used in his
>>>>> poster. Use the same notations.
>>>>> 
>>>>> _ "A significant suppression of D0 tagged jet yield with lower D0
>>>>> kinematics at RHIC energies? " -> Remove this bullet. Not needed to 
>>>>> say
>>>>> anything.
>>>>> 
>>>>> _ Make "radial distribution of the D^0" expression a bit bigger and 
>>>>> move
>>>>> it up so that people can see from distance.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Slide5:
>>>>> "A diffusion of charm quarks at lower pT in Au+Au collisions at sNN =
>>>>> 200 GeV?" -> It is not clear where do you get it. I think it is not
>>>>> needed. Just go to your results in 15min talk. In QM, people want to 
>>>>> see
>>>>> the results assuming they are aware of motivation.
>>>>> 
>>>>> _"Contribution from the underlying background is small at RHIC" This 
>>>>> is
>>>>> not absolutely correct. And not clear what underlying background you 
>>>>> are
>>>>> talking. So better to remove or rephrase this.
>>>>> 
>>>>> _In this slide important is to highlight the kienematic range of D^0
>>>>> that you are going to show: 1 - 10 GeV/c; That you mentioned at the
>>>>> bottom that no one will notice. Make it bigger and highlight somewhere
>>>>> up.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Slide7:
>>>>> combination background -> combinatoric background
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Slide8:
>>>>> _Suggestion: Less wording is better. Try to clean it up and make a
>>>>> concise phrase or sentence
>>>>> _ VS -> vs [and elsewhere]
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> You can bring slide4 and 5 before Slide12, so that you can tell people
>>>>> what you are going to tell next.
>>>>> Make 1-10 GeV/c kinematic slide in bold text on each slides.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Slide12:
>>>>> I hope you will speak a sentence on "LIDO" comparison .
>>>>> 
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>> Nihar
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 2023-08-28 10:53, webmaster--- via Star-hp-l wrote:
>>>>>> Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Yuan Su (suyuann AT mail.ustc.edu.cn) has submitted a material for a
>>>>>> review,
>>>>>> please have a look:
>>>>>> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/64968
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Deadline: 2023-09-03
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
>>>>>> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Star-hp-l mailing list
>>>>>> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>>>>>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Star-hp-l mailing list
>>>>> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>>>>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
>> _______________________________________________
>> Star-hp-l mailing list
>> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
> _______________________________________________
> Star-hp-l mailing list
> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l