star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: STAR HardProbes PWG
List archive
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Yan Wang for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review
- From: wy157543 AT mail.ustc.edu.cn
- To: "Barbara Trzeciak" <barbara.trzeciak AT gmail.com>
- Cc: "STAR HardProbes PWG" <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>, "Ma, Rongrong" <marr AT bnl.gov>, "Yi Yang" <yiyang0429 AT gmail.com>
- Subject: Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Yan Wang for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review
- Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2023 11:43:21 +0800 (GMT+08:00)
Hi Barbara,
Thank you for your nice comments.
please have a look: https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/64965
best,
Yan
-----原始邮件-----
发件人:"Barbara Trzeciak" <barbara.trzeciak AT gmail.com>
发送时间:2023-09-05 04:16:31 (星期二)
收件人: wy157543 AT mail.ustc.edu.cn
抄送: "STAR HardProbes PWG" <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>, "Ma, Rongrong" <marr AT bnl.gov>, "Yi Yang" <yiyang0429 AT gmail.com>
主题: Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Yan Wang for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for reviewHi Yan,I have a couple of small comments:- slide 19: this plot is quite busy now, would be good to work a bit more on this comparison. But due to short time, I just suggest at least enlarging the legend - you can put the pp part of the legend on a different panel.- slide 19: And add reference to the p+p results.- slide 22: study -> studies (in two places)- slide 22: I would add here J/psi v1 and v2 studies in the outlookCheers,BarbaraOn Mon, Sep 4, 2023 at 9:18 PM <wy157543 AT mail.ustc.edu.cn> wrote:Hi all,Thank you for your nice comments.please have a look: https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/64965best,Yan-----原始邮件-----
发件人:"Barbara Trzeciak via Star-hp-l" <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
发送时间:2023-09-04 21:52:22 (星期一)
收件人: "Ma, Rongrong" <marr AT bnl.gov>
抄送: "Barbara Trzeciak" <barbara.trzeciak AT gmail.com>, "Yi Yang" <yiyang0429 AT gmail.com>, "STAR HardProbes PWG" <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
主题: Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Yan Wang for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for reviewHi Rongrong,I'm fine with not showing PHENIX on the double ratio, indeed error propagation is not obvious.After a bit of thinking I see your point regarding the PHENIX point.Let's then keep the plots as they are.Cheers,BarbaraOn Mon, 4 Sept 2023, 08:41 Ma, Rongrong, <marr AT bnl.gov> wrote:Hello Barbara
My recollection is that it does not really make sense to show the double ratio for a pp measurement since it is by definition should be at unity. Of course, the PHENIX data point is not at unity since other data points were also used to determine the pp baseline. Nevertheless, it is still strange to see a pp data point in the double ratio figure. Furthermore, the propagation of the error bar is not trivial.
For the J/psi to Psi(2S) ratio plot (slide 11), the motivation to show the PHENIX data point is to illustrate that we need to use several data points at different energies to determine the pp reference, since the PHENIX measurement has a large error bar. Otherwise, it would be ideal to use PHENIX measurement as the reference since it is also at 200 GeV.
BestRongrong
On Sep 4, 2023, at 7:44 AM, Barbara Trzeciak via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
Hi Yan,
thanks for the updates slides.I think the PHENIX point should be removed from the ratio on slide 11 rather that from the double ratio - that was the original proposal. Also, on plots on slides 12 ans 13, please specify what the gray band around 1 is - if someone doesn't see the plot on slide 11 it's not clear how the uncertainty on pp comes from
Cheers,Barbara
_______________________________________________On Mon, 4 Sept 2023, 02:16 Yi Yang via Star-hp-l, <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
Hi Yan,
The updated version is good to me. Do you know when you will have the updated polarization plot?
Cheers,Yi
_______________________________________________On Mon, Sep 4, 2023 at 12:44 PM wy157543--- via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
Hi Yi,
Thank you for your nice comments. please have a look:_______________________________________________
best,Yan
-----原始邮件-----
发件人:"Yi Yang" <yiyang0429 AT gmail.com>
发送时间:2023-09-04 10:38:44 (星期一)
收件人: "STAR HardProbes PWG" <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
抄送: wy157543 AT mail.ustc.edu.cn
主题: Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Yan Wang for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review
Hi Yan,
Thanks a lot for the updated version. I only have some very minor comments for your consideration.- p2: dissociation --> Dissociation- p4: An extra space in front of "10-20 times"?- p10: pol --> polynomial function (since you have space)- p12: Remove the legend for "PHENIX pp, xxx"- p13: Remove the legend for "PHENIX pp, xxx"- p13: "Centrality dependence trend seems be similar to that at SPS than at LHC" --> "Centrality dependence trend seems be more similar to that at SPS than at LHC"- p21: statistic --> statisticsCheers,Yi
On Sun, Sep 3, 2023 at 9:19 PM wy157543--- via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
Hi all,
Thank you for your nice comments, The new version can be found at
best,Yan_______________________________________________
-----原始邮件-----
发件人:EsumiShinIchi <esumi.shinichi.gn AT u.tsukuba.ac.jp>
发送时间:2023-09-02 03:16:52 (星期六)
收件人: "STAR HardProbes PWG" <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
抄送: "wy157543 AT mail.ustc.edu.cn" <wy157543 AT mail.ustc.edu.cn>
主题: Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Yan Wang for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review
Dear YanI copied a comment from the google doc for your presentationon J/psi RAA energy dependence including SPS and LHC shownin the rehearsal today.Best regards, ShinIchi
S7: Legend missing for 62GeVWhy is it red for 54GeV? (add “preliminary”)17.3, 200, 5020 -> 17.3, 2760, 5020 GeV for Pb+Pb
2023/08/31 12:32、Barbara Trzeciak via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>のメール:
Hi Yan,
very nice slides.I propose to use a log scale for the x-axis on the right plot on slide 5 - energy dependence of J/psi RAA vs Npart.It should be easier to distinguish low Npart points, as for the colliding system scan on slide 8.I also suggest to highlight in some color bullet points with important physics messages, that we want to highlight.
Cheers,Barbara
_______________________________________________On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 9:21 PM Yi Yang via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
Hi Yan,
Thanks a lot for the nice slides. I have some comments on v3 for your consideration.- General: I would replace all "isobar" or "isobaric" to "Zr+Zr & Ru+Ru".- p4: I remember we used 4B isobar data before, right?- p7: Please indicate BHT2 is the new result for QM- p11: I don't think that we can say "Centrality dependence trend seems be closer to that at SPS than at LHC" with current statistics. Should we just say "They have similar centrality dependence"?- p12: Second bullet, can you calculate the significance? It looks like a 2-3 sigma effect...- p13: It would be good to show the Upsilon mass spectra from isobar data here.- p14 -15: I would move J/psi polarization before the Upsilon results. I understand you want to separate them by physics topic, so it is up to you.- p16: The ordering should be the same in your presentation, first talk about the J/psi in BES-II, then results from isobar.- p17: run23-25 --> run 23-25
Cheers,Yi
_______________________________________________On Sun, Aug 27, 2023 at 1:56 PM webmaster--- via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
Yan Wang (wy157543 AT mail.ustc.edu.cn) has submitted a material for a review,
please have a look:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/64965
Deadline: 2023-09-03
---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Yan Wang for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review
, (continued)
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Yan Wang for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review,
wy157543, 09/03/2023
- Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Yan Wang for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review, Mooney, Isaac, 09/03/2023
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Yan Wang for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review,
Yi Yang, 09/03/2023
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Yan Wang for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review,
wy157543, 09/04/2023
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Yan Wang for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review,
Yi Yang, 09/04/2023
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Yan Wang for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review,
Barbara Trzeciak, 09/04/2023
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Yan Wang for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review,
Ma, Rongrong, 09/04/2023
- Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Yan Wang for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review, Barbara Trzeciak, 09/04/2023
- Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Yan Wang for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review, wy157543, 09/04/2023
- Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Yan Wang for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review, Barbara Trzeciak, 09/04/2023
- Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Yan Wang for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review, wy157543, 09/04/2023
- Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Yan Wang for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review, Barbara Trzeciak, 09/05/2023
- [Star-hp-l] psi2s analysis preliminary figure, wy157543, 09/06/2023
- Re: [Star-hp-l] psi2s analysis preliminary figure, Yi Yang, 09/07/2023
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Yan Wang for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review,
Ma, Rongrong, 09/04/2023
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Yan Wang for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review,
Barbara Trzeciak, 09/04/2023
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Yan Wang for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review,
Yi Yang, 09/04/2023
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Yan Wang for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review,
wy157543, 09/04/2023
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Yan Wang for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review,
wy157543, 09/03/2023
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.