Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-hp-l - Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] STAR presentation by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury for SQM-2024 submitted for review

star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR HardProbes PWG

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Mooney, Isaac" <isaac.mooney AT yale.edu>
  • To: "star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] STAR presentation by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury for SQM-2024 submitted for review
  • Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 20:55:02 +0000

Hi Priyanka,

Just some small comments, including some suggestions for the figure beautification you mentioned is ongoing. I think the three-panel format is fine and I sign off on the proceedings.

Thanks,
Isaac

4. "for the STAR Collaboration"

22. Ref. 3 seems to be sufficient as a citation for the claim you are making. I suggest to just cite that one.

24. Extra parenthesis.

50 (and caption of Fig. 1). I found "D0+D0bar" confusing, since you're discussing invariant mass, so it seems like you're referring to the invariant mass of a D0-D0bar pair. Can you word it instead as D0 (D0bar), as you do in parts of the caption, or alternatively "D0 and D0bar"?

78. GeV

80. "with large statistical fluctuations"

Fig. 2. Please add a dashed line to each panel, make the axis label numbers and legends all the same size, and change |y| to |#eta|.
Caption: it might be confusing that you say "Measured C(k*)" when in eq. 2 you talk about "C_measured(k*)" but the C(k*) in this figure has been corrected for pair purity. So maybe say here "Corrected C(k*) for..." or similar, to distinguish them.

88. 
It's a bit odd to me to give a number for the source radius without being quantitative about the correlation magnitude. In the reference you give, they say "(~200 MeV/c)" for example. I would either give a number for the strength of correlation you're referring to in the first part of the sentence, or remove the sentence as it's redundant in this case with the sentence that starts "A weak or absent..."
"1-D" -> "one-dimensional"


On Sep 10, 2024, at 04:25, Roy Chowdhury Priyanka (DOKT) <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Dear convenors,

Kindly review my submitted proceeding for SQM and please provide your thoughtful comments.

Regards,
Priyanka



From: star-hp-l-request AT lists.bnl.gov <star-hp-l-request AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of webmaster AT star.bnl.gov <webmaster AT star.bnl.gov>
Sent: Saturday, September 7, 2024 10:56 AM
To: Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov <Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: [[Star-hp-l] ] STAR presentation by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury for SQM-2024 submitted for review
 
Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,

Priyanka Roy Chowdhury (priyanka.roy_chowdhury.dokt AT pw.edu.pl) has submitted  
a material for a review, please have a look:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/68859

---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact  
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page