STAR HardProbes PWG

["Roy Chowdhury Priyanka (DOKT)" <priyanka.roy_chowdhury.dokt AT pw.edu.pl>]

Hi Isaac,

Firstly, apologize for my delay in responding. Thanks for your thoughtful comments. I implemented all.

Regarding your comments, I have certain responses below.

Title: I changed it to make it consistent with the presentation title (of SQM) and also to avoid being the exact same as the ICHEP proceeding title which is on the pipeline

L24(23): couldn't find any extra parenthesis

L88: I removed the mentioned line as it was a strong statement in terms of making a conclusion as strong correlation is a result of small source radi. I checked with LL model fit that even large source radii with strong interaction (f0 larger) could cause strong interaction. So, I removed that line and the reference paper.

Fig2 is now updated

The updated version is at the same node.

https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/SQM_24_P_Roy_Chowdhury_V2.pdf

Please let me know if you have further comments and questions.

Regards,

Priyanka

---

From: star-hp-l-request AT lists.bnl.gov <star-hp-l-request AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of Mooney, Isaac <isaac.mooney AT yale.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2024 10:55 PM
To: star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] STAR presentation by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury for SQM-2024 submitted for review

 

Hi Priyanka,

Just some small comments, including some suggestions for the figure beautification you mentioned is ongoing. I think the three-panel format is fine and I sign off on the proceedings.

Thanks,

Isaac

4. "for the STAR Collaboration"

22. Ref. 3 seems to be sufficient as a citation for the claim you are making. I suggest to just cite that one.

24. Extra parenthesis.

50 (and caption of Fig. 1). I found "D0+D0bar" confusing, since you're discussing invariant mass, so it seems like you're referring to the invariant mass of a D0-D0bar pair. Can you word it instead as D0 (D0bar), as you do in parts of the caption, or alternatively "D0 and D0bar"?

78. GeV

80. "with large statistical fluctuations"

Fig. 2. Please add a dashed line to each panel, make the axis label numbers and legends all the same size, and change |y| to |#eta|.

Caption: it might be confusing that you say "Measured C(k*)" when in eq. 2 you talk about "C_measured(k*)" but the C(k*) in this figure has been corrected for pair purity. So maybe say here "Corrected C(k*) for..." or similar, to distinguish them.

88. 

It's a bit odd to me to give a number for the source radius without being quantitative about the correlation magnitude. In the reference you give, they say "(~200 MeV/c)" for example. I would either give a number for the strength of correlation you're referring to in the first part of the sentence, or remove the sentence as it's redundant in this case with the sentence that starts "A weak or absent..."

"1-D" -> "one-dimensional"

On Sep 10, 2024, at 04:25, Roy Chowdhury Priyanka (DOKT) <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Dear convenors,

Kindly review my submitted proceeding for SQM and please provide your thoughtful comments.

Regards,

Priyanka

---

From: star-hp-l-request AT lists.bnl.gov <star-hp-l-request AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of webmaster AT star.bnl.gov <webmaster AT star.bnl.gov>
Sent: Saturday, September 7, 2024 10:56 AM
To: Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov <Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: [[Star-hp-l] ] STAR presentation by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury for SQM-2024 submitted for review

 

Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,

Priyanka Roy Chowdhury (priyanka.roy_chowdhury.dokt AT pw.edu.pl) has submitted  
a material for a review, please have a look:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/68859

---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact  
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov