STAR HardProbes PWG

[Barbara Trzeciak <barbara.trzeciak AT gmail.com>]

Hi Brennan, All,

Following up on the RHIC vs LHC discussion and models.

Below are two plots from our and ALICE papers with Pythia predictions on top of them.

If we take ~same pT ranges, > 4 for RHIC and 4-8 GeV for LHC, and compare Pythia prediction at let's say norm mult of 4, we can clearly see that at the LHC energy it gives lower N_jpsi/<N_jpsi> than at RHIC.

It would be good to understand more physics there, but at least we could have some answer without running Pythia in a rush now. 

Cheers,

Barbara

On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 2:36 PM Mooney, Isaac <isaac.mooney AT yale.edu> wrote:

Hi Brennan,

Please upload the talk here: https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/add/starpresentations, and send the preliminary request slides to this email chain.

Thanks,

Isaac

On Sep 19, 2024, at 01:07, Brennan Schaefer <brs521 AT lehigh.edu> wrote:

Hi everyone, below is a draft of the HP2024 slides that is roughly 90% complete.  I have given a local rehearsal, and also applied many alterations.  Also, none of my data points have changed from those I showed last week.  Also, the differences between these data points and a final publishable result will be small.  The points may wiggle a small bit (going from current to publishable), but they won't jump around.

https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/20240920_HP2024_BSchaefer_rev_II.pdf

I'm wondering if an automatic email is supposed to go out or something?  For the PWG meeting tomorrow, I will be yet further too.

best,

b

On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 9:53 AM Brennan Schaefer <brs521 AT lehigh.edu> wrote:

Hi.  My practice was really just a group discussion about the talk, but I’m giving a dry run today.  Will it suffice if I have a working draft/edit to you by later this afternoon?  b

On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 9:47 AM Mooney, Isaac <isaac.mooney AT yale.edu> wrote:

Hi Brennan,

Good to know that nothing in the analysis is changing, but can you post a talk draft? It would help me as I write the STAR talk, and give the conveners time to edit it. It’s fine if it’s not perfect yet, but I assume you at least have something since you said you practiced it already locally. It would also be great if you could send preliminary request slides.

Thanks,

Isaac

On Sep 18, 2024, at 09:23, Brennan Schaefer <brs521 AT lehigh.edu> wrote:

Hi Nihar, et al, I will certainly present on Thursday.  None of the data points have moved, and I have only to show the plot [singular] with updated labeling and styling, etc.

Talk to you soon,

b

On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 2:45 AM Nihar Sahoo <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov> wrote:

Hello Brennan,

We have not received any updates from you since your last presentation 
regarding the progress and plots for HP2024.

I kindly suggest that you present your final results and any new updates 
at this week's HP-PWG meeting on Thursday. It will be challenging for us 
to approve your new results at the last minute.

Best
Nihar

On 2024-09-16 20:37, Brennan Schaefer wrote:
> Greetings HP2024 team,
> 
> I'm going over my talk this afternoon within our local group here at
> Lehigh.  After this iteration I should be able to pass it quickly
> along to you all.
> 
> best,
> 
> b
> 
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2024 at 9:50 AM Andrew Tamis <andrew.tamis AT yale.edu>
> wrote:
> 
>> Hello Isaac,
>> 
>> Apologies for the late reply, here are the links to my initial
>> preliminary request and the follow up.  Please let me know if you
>> have any additional questions
>> 
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/blog/atamis/TamisPreliminary-Request-82924
>> 
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/blog/atamis/Tamis-Hard-Probes-2024-Preliminary-Update
>> 
>> Best,
>> Andrew
>> 
>> On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 3:10 PM Mooney, Isaac
>> <isaac.mooney AT yale.edu> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Hard Probes presenters,
>>> 
>>> I would appreciate it if you could reply to this message with a
>>> link to your preliminary request slides (if applicable) and a
>>> sentence or two describing any follow-ups you are currently
>>> implementing from previous meeting discussions before preliminary
>>> status can be given, as well as an estimate for the time/date when
>>> you will send a final set of request slides. Sorry to those of you
>>> who have already sent slides in some form to other email chains
>>> — it would just be helpful for the conveners if we could collect
>>> the latest and most up-to-date links all in one place as we
>>> review.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Isaac