STAR HardProbes PWG

["Roy Chowdhury Priyanka (DOKT)" <priyanka.roy_chowdhury.dokt AT pw.edu.pl>]

Dear Barbara and all,

Thanks, for letting me know that you are fine with the current version, so I am considering this as approval from star-talks though officially my submission is still under HP. 

In this context, I would like to request HP-conveners to kindly push my submission to the next step for official approval. Meanwhile if anyone has any further comments, please let me know.

Regards,

Priyanka

---

From: star-hp-l-request AT lists.bnl.gov <star-hp-l-request AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of Barbara Trzeciak <barbara.trzeciak AT gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2024 1:10 PM
To: STAR HardProbes PWG <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Cc: Nihar Sahoo <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>; Yi Yang <yiyang429 AT gate.sinica.edu.tw>
Subject: Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] STAR presentation by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury for SQM-2024 submitted for review

 

Hi Priyanka,

From my side it's fine. But I don't think it's been signed off by the conveners.

Cheers,

Barbara 

On Sat, Sep 21, 2024, 11:58 AM "Roy Chowdhury Priyanka (DOKT)" <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Hi Barbara and all,

As the deadline is approaching (tomorrow), this is my kind request if you have any further comments and questions, please provide me.

Regards,

Priyanka

---

From: star-hp-l-request AT lists.bnl.gov <star-hp-l-request AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of "Roy Chowdhury Priyanka (DOKT)" <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2024 9:40 PM
To: star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Cc: Nihar Sahoo <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>; Yi Yang <yiyang429 AT gate.sinica.edu.tw>
Subject: Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] STAR presentation by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury for SQM-2024 submitted for review

 

Hi Barbara,

Thanks a lot for your feedback. Please find the updated version (V4) where I tried to address all your comments.

https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/SQM_24_P_Roy_Chowdhury_V4.pdf

Regards,

Priyanka

---

From: star-hp-l-request AT lists.bnl.gov <star-hp-l-request AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of Barbara Trzeciak <barbara.trzeciak AT gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2024 6:40 PM
To: star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Cc: Nihar Sahoo <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>; Yi Yang <yiyang429 AT gate.sinica.edu.tw>
Subject: Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] STAR presentation by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury for SQM-2024 submitted for review

 

Hi Priyanka,

Please find below a few comments on your nice proceedings.

- L13: D0 − π  -> D0 /D0bar − π± (same for the other cases)

- L19: heavy-ion collisions -> heavy-ion collisions by heavy quarks

- L24: I don't understand the following in the given context "are valuable for observing how heavy quarks interact with medium"

- L27: replicate -> describe

- L29: must be measured -> are of particular interest 

- L40: eq. -> Eq.

- L44: centrality range -> centrality range as the same-event pairs

- L52: Figure 1 -> Fig. 1

- L52: mass -> mass distributions

- L55-56: You define here 'S' and 'B ', however you already use 'S/B' in the previous sentence. Please reshuffle so that the definition is first.

- L56: It might not be clear why you quote purity only in the last pT bins. In purity in the lower bins, lower, higher ? This won't be obvious for many readers. 

- L64: D0 signal background -> background under the D0 peak

- L64: "reduce contamination of the identified hadron sample with π, K, p and e" - this might also not be clear, as you want to identify π, K, p. You need to explain a bit better

- L70: hadrons -> hadrons and electrons

- 80: with -> within

- L81: hovers around unity -> is consistent with unity

- L82: remove "likely due to insufficient data"

- L88: remove "analysis"

- Figure 2 caption: reference models -> NLO + HMChPT model

of 5 fm and 2 fm -> of 2 fm and 5 fm

Cheers,

Barbara

On Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 2:06 PM "Roy Chowdhury Priyanka (DOKT)" <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Hi Nihar,

I completely understand the situation. The deadline is 22nd of September.

Regards,

Priyanka 

---

From: star-hp-l-request AT lists.bnl.gov <star-hp-l-request AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of Nihar Sahoo <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2024 1:51 PM
To: star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Cc: Yi Yang <yiyang429 AT gate.sinica.edu.tw>
Subject: Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] STAR presentation by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury for SQM-2024 submitted for review

 

Hello Priyanka,

Due to HP2024 preparation, I am a bit late reading your proceedings.
I will send my comments soon. Do you know when is the deadline?

Best
Nihar

On 2024-09-18 17:15, "Roy Chowdhury Priyanka (DOKT)" wrote:
> Hi Yi and all,
>
> Thanks a lot.
>
> As the deadline is approaching, I would like to request Nihar and
> others to kindly go through my submission and kindly provide your
> comments and suggestions to improve my proceeding.
>
> Regards,
> Priyanka
>
> -------------------------
>
> From: star-hp-l-request AT lists.bnl.gov
> <star-hp-l-request AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of Yi Yang
> <yiyang429 AT gate.sinica.edu.tw>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2024 2:54 AM
> To: star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
> Subject: Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] STAR presentation by Priyanka Roy
> Chowdhury for SQM-2024 submitted for review
>
> Hi Priyanka,
>
> Thanks a lot for the updated version and the replies. I don't have any
> further comments on it.
>
> Cheers,
> Yi
>
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Yi Yang, Research Fellow
> Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica
> E-Mail: yiyang429 AT gate.sinica.edu.tw
> Tel: +886-2-2789-6709
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> -----Original message-----
> From:Roy Chowdhury Priyanka (DOKT)<star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
> To:star-hp-l<star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
> Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 17:15:57
> Subject: Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] STAR presentation by Priyanka Roy
> Chowdhury for SQM-2024 submitted for review
>  Hi Yi,
>
>  Thanks a lot for your feedback and comments. I implemented all your
> suggestions in the updated version
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/SQM_24_P_Roy_Chowdhury_V3.pd
> [1].
>  To answer your question regarding L51, I added a number (> 30% in
> lowest pT bin) to quantify the "acceptable" phrase.
>  For fig 2, this is a very good question, I need to think about why
> the error bars are larger in case of D-K in comparison to D-pi. If I
> understood the associate question correctly, then yes in the first two
> bins STAR data points are ~ 2-2.5 sigma away from the theory points
> calculated for R = 2 fm in both cases.
>
>  Regards,
>  Priyanka
>
> -------------------------
>
> From: star-hp-l-request AT lists.bnl.gov
> <star-hp-l-request AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of Yi Yang
> <yiyang429 AT gate.sinica.edu.tw>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2024 3:22 AM
> To: star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
> Subject: Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] STAR presentation by Priyanka Roy
> Chowdhury for SQM-2024 submitted for review
>
> Hi Priyanka,
>
> Thanks a lot for the nice proceedings. I have some minor comments for
> your consideration.
>  - Eq.1: I saw you get this from Eq. 35 from the reference for
> Kooin-Pratt equation. But it would be nice to mention you get this
> from the reference, too.
>  - L46: It would be nice to slightly introduce STAR first before
> talking about HFT.
>  - L51: what is "acceptable S/B"?
>  - Eq.2: PairPurity --> Pair Purity (since you used it in L64).
>  - Figure 2: This plot looks GREAT! Thanks a lot! Do we know why the
> theoretical curves have much smaller uncertainties for D-pi compared
> to D-k? Do you calculate to how many sigma data is away from the R=2
> fm (probably on 2-3 sigma).
>
> Cheers,
> Yi
>
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Yi Yang, Research Fellow
> Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica
> E-Mail: yiyang429 AT gate.sinica.edu.tw
> Tel: +886-2-2789-6709
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> -----Original message-----
> From:webmaster AT star.bnl.gov
> To:Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> Date:Sat, 07 Sep 2024 16:56:24
> Subject:[[Star-hp-l] ] STAR presentation by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury for
> SQM-2024 submitted for review
>
> Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>
> Priyanka Roy Chowdhury (priyanka.roy_chowdhury.dokt AT pw.edu.pl) has
> submitted
> a material for a review, please have a look:
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/68859
>
> ---
> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
>
>
>
> Links:
> ------
> [1]
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/SQM_24_P_Roy_Chowdhury_V3.pdf