STAR HardProbes PWG

["Ceska, Jakub" <jakub.ceska AT fjfi.cvut.cz>]

Dear Qian,

thank you very much for your comments! They are implemented in v4 of the abstract.

The pT has been studied up to 10 GeV/c for now, but with the BHT2 dataset it should be viable to include a 10-15 GeV/c bin. The rages were included in brackets; please let me know if this is alright, or if I should change this.

Thank you for your time.

Best regards,
Jakub

---

Od: tc88qy <tc88qy AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
Odesláno: neděle 27. října 2024 12:44
Komu: star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Kopie: Ceska, Jakub <jakub.ceska AT fjfi.cvut.cz>
Předmět: Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] STAR presentation by Jakub Ceska for Quark Matter 2025 submitted for review

 

Hello Jakub,
   Nice abstract. Please find my comments below:

  First paragraph, you mentioned quarkonium. Then it changes to upsilon
at second paragraph. Better to mention why upsilon is important?
Larger mass and binding energy give a more precise prediction for
upsilon than J/Psi.
In the second part, It will be good to mention the upsilon rapidity and
pT range.

as well as the invariant production cross-section -> as well as the
inclusive production cross-section.

Qian Yang

On 2024-10-27 14:32, Ceska, Jakub wrote:
> Dear Isaac,
>
> thank you for your comments, I fully agree. I have decided to omit the
> reference of heavy-ion collisions, which is not the focus of this
> study. I have implemented your comments in the new version (v3).
>
> Thank you for your time and sorry for my delay related to travel.
>
> Best regards,
> Jakub
>
> -------------------------
>
> Od: star-hp-l-request AT lists.bnl.gov <star-hp-l-request AT lists.bnl.gov>
> za uživatele Mooney, Isaac <isaac.mooney AT yale.edu>
> Odesláno: pátek 25. října 2024 18:04
> Komu: star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
> Předmět: Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] STAR presentation by Jakub Ceska for
> Quark Matter 2025 submitted for review
>
> Hi Jakub,
>
> Nice abstract — it will make a great poster. Please find a few small
> comments below. With these addressed, I sign off.
>
> Thanks,
> Isaac
>
> The first statement is a bit of a tautology -- "The study of []...is
> of great interest in understanding []". Maybe "The study of quarkonium
> production in p+p collisions is of great interest in understanding the
> relative importance of mechanisms that contribute to its formation,
> which is an outstanding question" or something like that. This
> formulation would probably require breaking the mention of heavy-ion
> collisions to a separate sentence, especially because it would fit
> better this way with the sentence which comes after (you might be able
> to merge those two).
>
> "during Run17" is unnecessary and can be removed.
>
> "larger data sample"
>
> On Oct 25, 2024, at 09:37, webmaster AT star.bnl.gov wrote:
>
> Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>
> Jakub Ceska (jakub.ceska AT fjfi.cvut.cz) has submitted a material for a
> review,
> please have a look:
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/69681
>
> Deadline: 2024-10-31
> ---
> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov