Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l - Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] FW: VERY IMPORTANT

usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: U.S. ATLAS HL-LHC Upgrade Level 2 and Deputies-NSF only Management Mailing List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Stephanie Majewski <smajewsk AT uoregon.edu>
  • To: John Parsons <parsons AT nevis.columbia.edu>
  • Cc: Michael Tuts <tuts AT pmtuts.net>, "usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] FW: VERY IMPORTANT
  • Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 20:52:33 +0000

Hi John,

I just took FY20 + 1/2 FY21 as an estimate.

Stephanie

On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 12:44 PM John Parsons <parsons AT nevis.columbia.edu> wrote:

Hi all,

        I was looking back at the documentation from the time of FDR, such as
the L2 Cost Book.   However, everything is rolled up according to FY, so
I don't see a simple way with those docs to get the costs for Apr.
1/2020 - Mar. 31/2021.
        Mike/Jon, will you be able to get that from the Cost Controls people?

                John

On 12/12/19 1:14 PM, Michael Tuts wrote:
> Hi NSF scope L2 and deputy,
>
> Despite knowing the LS3 would be delayed by a year, NSF is now asking on
> a very short timescale for an assessment of the impact. There is one
> question posed where we can use your input on the impact of a 1 year
> delay of MREFC funding.
>
> “Please also comment on the impacts, by Level 2 WBS, of the impacts if
> there were to be a one-year delay in the start of MREFC funding. Include
> the risks or standing army costs of engineer and technician labor, or
> other negative impacts of NSF funding delay. Im assuming the risk of
> losing key technical staff in your engineering pool that would otherwise
> move to other projects at the various universities is a big factor.”
>
> Can you please provide an initial assessment for your L2 asap – note we
> are requested to provide an answer by 9am tomorrow (Friday)!
>
> Thanks, PO
>
> *From:* Coles, Mark W. <mcoles AT nsf.gov>
> *Sent:* Thursday, December 12, 2019 12:23 PM
> *To:* Michael Tuts <tuts AT pmtuts.net>; Anders Ryd <anders.ryd AT cornell.edu>
> *Cc:* Gonzalez, Saul <sgonzale AT nsf.gov>; Caldwell, C. Denise
> <dcaldwel AT nsf.gov>
> *Subject:* VERY IMPORTANT
> *Importance:* High
>
> Dear Mike and Anders
>
> Would each of you please send me, by 9AM Friday morning, your immediate
> assessment of the impacts on the ATLAS or CMS MREFC program of the CERN
> schedule delay? Please provide a summary, by level 2 WBS element, of
> what you believe this impacts to be, or if there are none.
>
> Please also comment on the impacts, by Level 2 WBS, of the impacts if
> there were to be a one-year delay in the start of MREFC funding. Include
> the risks or standing army costs of engineer and technician labor, or
> other negative impacts of NSF funding delay. Im assuming the risk of
> losing key technical staff in your engineering pool that would otherwise
> move to other projects at the various universities is a big factor.
>
> Please provide a summary description of the process that ATLAS and CMS,
> at the international level, will implement (or that you anticipate they
> will implement) to realign their construction programs, and any knock-on
> effects on NSF.
>
> Please try to keep this at a concise summary level so that the whole
> response is about one page for each detector.
>
> I expect to get a thousand hand wringing questions from various high
> officials within NSF about this, as they hate surprises. Obvviously you
> are having to react quickly to new information, so it will be important
> to emphasize where the NSF program is decoupled from other agency
> activities or the international schedule, minimizing impacts, and where
> a delayed start by NSF would nevertheless be damaging to NSF-supported
> scientists and their opportunities to participate in the HL LHC program.
>
> Email if you have more questions. Our goal here at NSF is to put out a
> three page summary by COB Friday, one page from NSF internal evaluation,
> one page from ATLAS, and one from CMS.
>
> The delay information we’ve seen here at NSF was blamed on the need for
> a long detector fabrication schedule. What is driving it?
>
> Thanks
>
> Mark
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l mailing list
> Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l__;!!C5qS4YX3!SteTAxYDbnbSmzRooqU_WIJdvuEYF9kYFrdhob_iQGtxzRUYKx8OfXI9zR0MOPsmOoc$
>

--
______________________________________________________________________

John Parsons
Nevis Labs,             Email: parsons AT nevis.columbia.edu
  Columbia University   Phone: (914) 591-2820
P.O. Box 137            Fax: (914) 591-8120
Irvington, NY 10533     WWW: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.nevis.columbia.edu_-7Eparsons_&d=DwID-g&c=aTOVZmpUfPKZuaG9NO7J7Mh6imZbfhL47t9CpZ-pCOw&r=Z0wuTxQYnTTMlYma4lGZlO3skeCGVBrGGurYkWbhJsJuG5HaY82rmCNSdFOV7C4Z&m=iGs3hVDY7I8x8431V5EUhE-U8067DiiBCuW0wQcPfNA&s=IVwIexqfUeKKouYh65z7vIsZw2E6e_D-oxa6lK9qwlc&e=   

______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l mailing list
Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l__;!!C5qS4YX3!SteTAxYDbnbSmzRooqU_WIJdvuEYF9kYFrdhob_iQGtxzRUYKx8OfXI9zR0MOPsmOoc$



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page