U.S. ATLAS HL-LHC Upgrade Level 2 and Deputies-NSF only Management Mailing List

[Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu>]

Hello all,

A quick update:

> -6.4.1: you should also say there was a mistake in statusing.  Otherwise 
> the BCP is not allowed!

This still needs to be fixed.

> -6.4.2 is missing
>
> -6.4.3: "Delay is also being caused by the lack of FPGAs to assemble on 
> the French LASP boards," is not true.  The easiest is probably to remove 
> that sentence.

Thanks for 6.4.2 and 6.4.3, those look fine.

> -6.5.1 is fine
>
> -6.6, 6.6.1, 6.6.3 are fine
>
> -6.6.4: there is a $237k schedule variance that is not discussed

This still needs to get fixed.


> -6.6.5: "Error in reporting will be address in the September reports. "?
>
> -6.8 is missing
>
> -6.8.2 is fine
>
> -6.8.3: "It is not yet clear if the additional effort will significantly 
> ameliorate the negative SV over time, so there is currently insufficient 
> evidence to amend EAC for WBS 6.8.3." is a little strange as extra 
> effort should lead to making up schedule.  I think it's a leftover from 
> when there was a cost variance...  maybe just delete?

All good now.

Best,

Gustaaf