Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l - Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] Variance reports comments

usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: U.S. ATLAS HL-LHC Upgrade Level 2 and Deputies-NSF only Management Mailing List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu>
  • To: usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
  • Subject: Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] Variance reports comments
  • Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 10:08:38 +0200


Thanks all, I think we're good for this month.

On 10/28/21 11:30 AM, Gustaaf Brooijmans wrote:

Hello all,

A quick update:

-6.4.1: you should also say there was a mistake in statusing. Otherwise the BCP is not allowed!

This still needs to be fixed.


-6.4.2 is missing

-6.4.3: "Delay is also being caused by the lack of FPGAs to assemble on the French LASP boards," is not true.  The easiest is probably to remove that sentence.

Thanks for 6.4.2 and 6.4.3, those look fine.


-6.5.1 is fine

-6.6, 6.6.1, 6.6.3 are fine

-6.6.4: there is a $237k schedule variance that is not discussed

This still needs to get fixed.



-6.6.5: "Error in reporting will be address in the September reports. "?

-6.8 is missing

-6.8.2 is fine

-6.8.3: "It is not yet clear if the additional effort will significantly ameliorate the negative SV over time, so there is currently insufficient evidence to amend EAC for WBS 6.8.3." is a little strange as extra effort should lead to making up schedule.  I think it's a leftover from when there was a cost variance...  maybe just delete?

All good now.

Best,

Gustaaf

_______________________________________________
Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l mailing list
Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page