U.S. ATLAS HL-LHC Upgrade Level 2 and Deputies-NSF only Management Mailing List

[Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu>]

Hello all,

An update.  (Keep in mind that February is short so Mike needs to send the 
report to NSF on Monday, so this needs to converge by Friday.)

-6.4 is missing
-6.4.1 is good
-6.4.2 is missing
-6.4.3 was already good

-6.5* are good

-6.6* were already good

-6.8 is missing
-6.8.2: when will this L3 be closed?  Will there be a remaining cost 
variance?  If so we’ll want to make a corrective action at some point to make 
sure it doesn’t affect the EAC
-6.8.3 is good

-6.10.2 is missing

Best,

Gustaaf


> On Feb 22, 2022, at 9:44 AM, Gustaaf Brooijmans 
> <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hello all,
> 
> January variance reports are due.  Here are some comments so far:
> 
> -6.4 is missing
> -6.4.1: “realized with other ongoing, closely related projects” suggests 
> that we save money because of non-ATLAS work.  Please rephrase.
> -6.4.2 is missing
> -6.4.3 is good
> 
> -6.5 and 6.5.1 are missing
> 
> -6.6.* are all good
> 
> -6.8 are all missing
> 
> -6.10.2 is missing
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Gustaaf
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l mailing list
> Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l
>