usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: U.S. ATLAS HL-LHC Upgrade Level 2 and Deputies-NSF only Management Mailing List
List archive
Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] January variance reports
- From: Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu>
- To: Stephanie Majewski <smajewsk AT uoregon.edu>
- Cc: Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
- Subject: Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] January variance reports
- Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 09:29:54 +0100
A quick update - remember that this needs to converge *today*:
6.4 and 6.4.2 are still missing
-6.8: we need to quantify the fraction represented by the different contributions. In this case it can be read from the L3 report, but it should still mention it, so something like "The negative SV is driven by WBS 6.8.3 (Global Trigger firmware) - $270k of $310k - due to…”
-6.8.2: if the $130k will stay, did the ETC include a $130k correction? If not, please say in the corrective action that this will be done starting next month, and please make sure it does. Otherwise the EAC is off.
Thx
Gustaaf
On Feb 25, 2022, at 1:33 AM, Stephanie Majewski <smajewsk AT uoregon.edu> wrote:Hi Gustaaf,See below.StephanieOn Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 2:07 AM Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu> wrote:
Hello all,
An update. (Keep in mind that February is short so Mike needs to send the report to NSF on Monday, so this needs to converge by Friday.)
-6.4 is missing
-6.4.1 is good
-6.4.2 is missing
-6.4.3 was already good
-6.5* are good
-6.6* were already good
-6.8 is missing--> now complete-6.8.2: when will this L3 be closed? Will there be a remaining cost variance? If so we’ll want to make a corrective action at some point to make sure it doesn’t affect the EAC--> We can consider this L3 "closed" now. The current cost variance of $133k will remain.-6.8.3 is good
-6.10.2 is missing
Best,
Gustaaf
> On Feb 22, 2022, at 9:44 AM, Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu> wrote:
>
>
> Hello all,
>
> January variance reports are due. Here are some comments so far:
>
> -6.4 is missing
> -6.4.1: “realized with other ongoing, closely related projects” suggests that we save money because of non-ATLAS work. Please rephrase.
> -6.4.2 is missing
> -6.4.3 is good
>
> -6.5 and 6.5.1 are missing
>
> -6.6.* are all good
>
> -6.8 are all missing
>
> -6.10.2 is missing
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gustaaf
>
> _______________________________________________
> Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l mailing list
> Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l__;!!C5qS4YX3!UZkFZtgOrhabiZ2LygbXQvUZkzsebQO7mJQoGeSZ-VTCtGLnGg614B-MP3QZLFWl1CA$
>
_______________________________________________
Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l mailing list
Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l__;!!C5qS4YX3!UZkFZtgOrhabiZ2LygbXQvUZkzsebQO7mJQoGeSZ-VTCtGLnGg614B-MP3QZLFWl1CA$
-
[Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] January variance reports,
Gustaaf Brooijmans, 02/22/2022
-
Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] January variance reports,
Gustaaf Brooijmans, 02/24/2022
-
Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] January variance reports,
Stephanie Majewski, 02/24/2022
- Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] January variance reports, Gustaaf Brooijmans, 02/25/2022
-
Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] January variance reports,
Stephanie Majewski, 02/24/2022
-
Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] January variance reports,
Gustaaf Brooijmans, 02/24/2022
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.