Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l - Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] September VRs

usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: U.S. ATLAS HL-LHC Upgrade Level 2 and Deputies-NSF only Management Mailing List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu>
  • To: Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
  • Subject: Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] September VRs
  • Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 11:28:48 +0200


Hello all,

A quick follow-up:

>
>
> -6.4: I am sending this back to you: you say that "The VL+ optical link
> modules should be available for purchase by early 2023.” This contradicts
> what’s written under 6.4.1 (and it’s incorrect).

Please fix this. I should be unlocked.

The rest of 6.4 and 6.5 I have approved.

6.6 seems fine and I’ll approve that
6.6.1: making a BCP would be a corrective action, not an impact. But I will
approve it this time.
6.6.3: how much is chip and substrate production, and how much is the rest.
But the explanation seems to contradict the impact that says all chips and
packages are available. Can you rephrase?
6.6.4: is it still 3 month/9 months? That was already what you wrote in
July… we will include the schedule slip into the covid BCP since it’s due to
supply chain effects

6.8 is fine
6.8.3 is fine

6.10.2 is fine.

Best,

Gustaaf


>
> -6.6, 6.6.1, 6.6.3, 6.6.4 are all missing
> -6.6.5 is fine
>
> -6.8 and 6.8.3 are missing
> -6.8.4 needs to be submitted for me to approve it.
>
> 6.10.2 is missing
>
> Please fix in the next day or two.
>
> Thx
>
> Gustaaf
> _______________________________________________
> Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l mailing list
> Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l
>





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page