usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: U.S. ATLAS HL-LHC Upgrade Level 2 and Deputies-NSF only Management Mailing List

List archive

[Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] November VRs

From: Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu>
To: Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov, Tim Andeen <timothy.robert.andeen AT cern.ch>, Andy Haas <andy.haas AT nyu.edu>, "Hadavand, Haleh K" <hadavand AT uta.edu>, Elliot Lipeles <lipeles AT sas.upenn.edu>, Reinhard Schwienhorst <reinhard.schwienhorst AT cern.ch>, Junjie Zhu <junjie AT umich.edu>
Subject: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] November VRs
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2022 12:04:58 +0100

Hello all,

I hope you are enjoying some time off with friends and family and only
keeping an eye on email in limited way. Unfortunately, I do have some
comments on the posted VRs:

-6.4 looks good
-6.4.1: the SV variance report is good, but the CV report is missing (and
maybe there should be a CA that says rebaselining will take care of things)
-6.4.2 looks good
-6.4.3 should indicate what fraction of the SV is attributable to each of the
two sources listed (I have unlocked this one)

-6.5.3 looks good
-6.5.4 is missing

-6.6 is missing
-6.6.1 the explanation for the cost variance is missing (I have unlocked it)
-6.6.3: the impact statement is inconsistent with the explanation
-6.6.4 is missing
-6.6.5 looks good

-6.8 is missing
-6.8.3 looks good
-6.8.4 looks good => please submit this

I will try to take another look tomorrow.

Best,

Gustaaf

[Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] November VRs, Gustaaf Brooijmans, 12/28/2022
- Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] November VRs, Gustaaf Brooijmans, 12/29/2022
  - Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] November VRs, Elliot Lipeles, 12/30/2022
  - Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] November VRs, Gustaaf Brooijmans, 12/31/2022