usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: U.S. ATLAS HL-LHC Upgrade Level 2 and Deputies-NSF only Management Mailing List
List archive
Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] November VRs
- From: Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu>
- To: Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov, Tim Andeen <timothy.robert.andeen AT cern.ch>, Andy Haas <andy.haas AT nyu.edu>, Reinhard Schwienhorst <reinhard.schwienhorst AT cern.ch>
- Subject: Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] November VRs
- Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2022 09:05:18 +0100
Hello all,
We need to finalize the VRs today (well, a week ago), so please:
-6.4.1: please submit
-6.4.3: should indicate what fraction of the SV is attributable to each of
the two sources listed
-6.6.1: thanks for the fixes, please submit
-6.8 is still missing
Thanks,
Gustaaf
> On Dec 29, 2022, at 11:09 AM, Gustaaf Brooijmans
> <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu> wrote:
>
>
> Hello all,
>
> A quick update:
>
>
>> -6.4.1: the SV variance report is good, but the CV report is missing (and
>> maybe there should be a CA that says rebaselining will take care of things)
>
> The update looks good, please submit.
>
>> -6.4.3 should indicate what fraction of the SV is attributable to each of
>> the two sources listed (I have unlocked this one)
>>
>> -6.5.4 is missing
>
> Looks good, thanks!
>
>>
>> -6.6 is missing
>
> Looks good, approved.
>
>> -6.6.1 the explanation for the cost variance is missing (I have unlocked
>> it)
>
> Thanks for the update, but
> "The cost variance is due to a correction that was made to the Actuals to
> reflect invoices. This is temporary, while we are waiting for CERN invoices
> to be processed and then paid.”
> => we cannot have text like this in a VR as this sounds like the reason for
> the cost variance is not having received an invoice, ie using invoices
> instead of accruals.
> => I have unlocked again.
>
>> -6.6.3: the impact statement is inconsistent with the explanation
>
> Thanks for the update, please submit.
>
>> -6.6.4 is missing
>
> Thanks. I’ll approve. (I note that in 6.6 you give info that’s not in
> 6.6.4.)
>
>>
>> -6.8 is missing
>
> Still missing.
>
>> -6.8.4 looks good => please submit this
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gustaaf
> _______________________________________________
> Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l mailing list
> Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l
>
-
[Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] November VRs,
Gustaaf Brooijmans, 12/28/2022
-
Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] November VRs,
Gustaaf Brooijmans, 12/29/2022
- Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] November VRs, Elliot Lipeles, 12/30/2022
- Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] November VRs, Gustaaf Brooijmans, 12/31/2022
-
Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] November VRs,
Gustaaf Brooijmans, 12/29/2022
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.