U.S. ATLAS HL-LHC Upgrade Level 2 and Deputies-NSF only Management Mailing List

[Elliot Lipeles <lipeles AT sas.upenn.edu>]

6.8.4 is now submitted.

(Jahred was in charge while I was gone, but didn't realize he needed to press a separate submit button because he apparently is not allowed to submit it).

Elliot

On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 5:09 AM Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu> wrote:

Hello all,

A quick update:


> -6.4.1: the SV variance report is good, but the CV report is missing (and maybe there should be a CA that says rebaselining will take care of things)

The update looks good, please submit.

> -6.4.3 should indicate what fraction of the SV is attributable to each of the two sources listed (I have unlocked this one)
>
> -6.5.4 is missing

Looks good, thanks!

>
> -6.6 is missing

Looks good, approved.

> -6.6.1 the explanation for the cost variance is missing (I have unlocked it)

Thanks for the update, but 
"The cost variance is due to a correction that was made to the Actuals to reflect invoices. This is temporary, while we are waiting for CERN invoices to be processed and then paid.”
=> we cannot have text like this in a VR as this sounds like the reason for the cost variance is not having received an invoice, ie using invoices instead of accruals.
=> I have unlocked again.

> -6.6.3: the impact statement is inconsistent with the explanation

Thanks for the update, please submit.

> -6.6.4 is missing

Thanks. I’ll approve.  (I note that in 6.6 you give info that’s not in 6.6.4.)

>
> -6.8 is missing

Still missing.

> -6.8.4 looks good => please submit this

Thanks,

Gustaaf

--

Elliot Lipeles

Associate Professor

Physics and Astronomy