U.S. ATLAS HL-LHC Upgrade Level 2 and Deputies-NSF only Management Mailing List

[Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu>]

Hello all,

A quick follow-up:

6.4 and 6.4.2 are still missing

6.5.4 looks good and I have approved

6.6.1 and 6.6.3 look good and I have approved

6.8 and 6.8.4 are still missing

6.10.2: thanks, but you have an old sentence in the middle "which is 
reflected in an ~$9k reduction in the cumulative positive variance since last 
month”; I’ve unlocked so you can correct.  BTW, did you make any changes 
there as part of BCP-1057?  Since the cost variance will go away when we set 
S=P=A we’ll want to make sure the new consultant costs are in.

Thx

Gustaaf

> On Jan 23, 2023, at 10:07 AM, Gustaaf Brooijmans 
> <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hello all,
> 
> A reminder that the December variance reports are due.  Many thanks to 
> those who have filed in time.  Below are my comments.
> 
> Thx
> 
> Gustaaf
> 
> 6.4 is missing
> 6.4.1 looks good
> 6.4.2 is missing
> 6.4.3 looks good
> 
> 6.5.3 looks good
> 6.5.4 is missing
> 
> 6.6 looks good
> 6.6.1: so, is the cost variance real?  If so, what is it due to?  Savings 
> on parts?  Or labor?  Or is the correction that was made the mistake?
>  => I’m unlocking this one
> 6.6.3 is fine => please submit it
> 6.6.4 is fine
> 6.6.5 is fine
> 
> 6.8 is missing
> 6.8.3 is fine
> 6.8.4 is missing
> 
> 6.10.2 is missing
> _______________________________________________
> Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l mailing list
> Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l
>