usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: U.S. ATLAS HL-LHC Upgrade Level 2 and Deputies-NSF only Management Mailing List
List archive
Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] December variance reports
- From: Michael Tuts <tuts AT pmtuts.net>
- To: Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu>, "Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Subject: Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] December variance reports
- Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2023 15:31:05 +0000
Hi Gustaaf,
On your points.
* the "~9k" is correct for December (decrease of $9,187 from November) and is
the same as for November (identical decrease of $9,187 from October). So that
variance should vanish in 4 months or so, and of course start going negative.
I will resubmit as is.
* I did not yet update those PO costs. On my todo list, will try for today.
Cheers, Mike
-----Original Message-----
From: Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l
<usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov> On Behalf Of Gustaaf
Brooijmans
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2023 5:12 AM
To: Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] December variance reports
Hello all,
A quick follow-up:
6.4 and 6.4.2 are still missing
6.5.4 looks good and I have approved
6.6.1 and 6.6.3 look good and I have approved
6.8 and 6.8.4 are still missing
6.10.2: thanks, but you have an old sentence in the middle "which is
reflected in an ~$9k reduction in the cumulative positive variance since last
month”; I’ve unlocked so you can correct. BTW, did you make any changes
there as part of BCP-1057? Since the cost variance will go away when we set
S=P=A we’ll want to make sure the new consultant costs are in.
Thx
Gustaaf
> On Jan 23, 2023, at 10:07 AM, Gustaaf Brooijmans
> <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu> wrote:
>
>
> Hello all,
>
> A reminder that the December variance reports are due. Many thanks to
> those who have filed in time. Below are my comments.
>
> Thx
>
> Gustaaf
>
> 6.4 is missing
> 6.4.1 looks good
> 6.4.2 is missing
> 6.4.3 looks good
>
> 6.5.3 looks good
> 6.5.4 is missing
>
> 6.6 looks good
> 6.6.1: so, is the cost variance real? If so, what is it due to? Savings
> on parts? Or labor? Or is the correction that was made the mistake?
> => I’m unlocking this one
> 6.6.3 is fine => please submit it
> 6.6.4 is fine
> 6.6.5 is fine
>
> 6.8 is missing
> 6.8.3 is fine
> 6.8.4 is missing
>
> 6.10.2 is missing
> _______________________________________________
> Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l mailing list
> Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-
> l
>
_______________________________________________
Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l mailing list
Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l
-
[Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] December variance reports,
Gustaaf Brooijmans, 01/23/2023
-
Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] December variance reports,
Gustaaf Brooijmans, 01/24/2023
- Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] December variance reports, Michael Tuts, 01/24/2023
- Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] December variance reports, Gustaaf Brooijmans, 01/27/2023
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] December variance reports, Gustaaf Brooijmans, 01/23/2023
-
Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] December variance reports,
Gustaaf Brooijmans, 01/24/2023
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.