Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l - Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] Updated contingency sheet with "for presentation" tab

usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: U.S. ATLAS HL-LHC Upgrade Level 2 and Deputies-NSF only Management Mailing List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Stephanie Majewski <smajewsk AT uoregon.edu>
  • To: Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu>
  • Cc: "Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] Updated contingency sheet with "for presentation" tab
  • Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2023 22:51:33 +0000

Hi Gustaaf,

Jinlong and I both looked at this and it looks reasonable to us.

For the EF Tracking review, will Mike include any of these results in his overview or should I put the EF tracking number in the EF Tracking cost & schedule talk? It’s a little awkward without the description of the methodology, so I’m not sure what is best.

Thanks,

Stephanie

On Feb 24, 2023, at 1:39 PM, Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu> wrote:


Hello all,

We think we’ve worked the kinks out of all the numbers.  In the attached you will find a for presentation tab, as well as a working tab with a bit more info on floats, and all the detailed info.  Let us know if you see something weird.  The for presentation tab calculates % contingency on the cost-to-go, which gives a better idea of where we are.

Best,

Chris and Gustaaf

<2023-02-nsf-dr-summary-v6b.xlsx>





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page