Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l - Re: [[Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] ] New CERN need-by dates, NSF scope

usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: U.S. ATLAS HL-LHC Upgrade Level 2 and Deputies-NSF only Management Mailing List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu>
  • To: Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu>
  • Cc: usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
  • Subject: Re: [[Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] ] New CERN need-by dates, NSF scope
  • Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2024 16:34:39 -0500


Hello all,

Here’s an updated version, using Michel’s latest LS3 schedule. TDAQ is still
under discussion, so please ignore that.

Best,

Gustaaf

Attachment: CERN Need by dates-NSF.xlsx
Description: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet



> On Nov 20, 2024, at 17:05, Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu>
> wrote:
>
>
> Hello all,
>
> It turns out NSF needs updated CERN need-by dates for their internal
> reporting. I tried to devise these from what we presented at the last
> annual review, basically adding 8 months to each of the need-by milestones
> (except for LAr, where I have numbers from Michel). The 8 months comes
> from the shift in the end of Run 3. Michel used the additional delay in
> the start of HL-LHC to make the I&I schedule a little less tight (except
> for ITk).
>
> Please let me know if these seem sensible to you. We will make it clear to
> NSF that these are preliminary. A reply by the end of the week would be
> appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gustaaf
>
> <CERN Need by dates-NSF.xlsx>




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page