U.S. ATLAS HL-LHC Upgrade Level 2 and Deputies-NSF only Management Mailing List

[Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu>]

Hello all,

Today’s update:

-6.4: I have approved
-6.4.1: what does "We had received 4890 devices at SMU (about 35% of the 
total) and delivered to CERN. “ mean?  Why deliver to CERN?  I have unlocked 
this.
-6.4.2: I have approved

-6.5.4: it’s a bit messy with first a segment on schedule variance, then an 
explanation of cost variance, then another segment on schedule variance.  
Also the grammar is a bit iffy.  Given that we are on the eve of the holiday 
break, I have approved, but please pay a bit more attention next time.

-6.6.4 I have approved

-6.8.1 and 6.8.4 are still missing, so cc’ing Elliot and and Dan.

Best,

Gustaaf


> On Dec 19, 2024, at 09:28, Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu> 
> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hello all,
> 
> Please remind your teams to file their variance reports today.  The 
> deadline is tomorrow and many are missing (6.4, 6.4.1, 6.4.2, 6.5.4, 6.6.4, 
> 6.8.1, 6.8.4).  Below are comments on those that have been filed.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Gustaaf
> 
> -6.4.3: I have approved, but presumably at some point the expensive LASPs 
> and LASP test stands will be bought?  Something to consider for next month.
> -6.6: I have approved (but note that for the CSM we’ll just have to carry 
> the variance, as most of that is in the past)
> -6.6.3: I have approved 
> -6.6.5: I have approved (but maybe next month say something about the BCP 
> in the corrective action here as well)
>