U.S. ATLAS HL-LHC Upgrade Level 2 and Deputies-NSF only Management Mailing List

[Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu>]

Thanks for completing this.  I have approved the remaining VARs.

Happy holidays all!

Gustaaf

On Dec 20, 2024, at 21:08, Elliot Lipeles <lipeles AT sas.upenn.edu> wrote:

I did it this afternoon right around when you sent this message. It should be there. 

Elliot

On Fri, Dec 20, 2024, 2:28 PM Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu> wrote:

Hello all,

Today’s update:

-6.4: I have approved
-6.4.1: what does "We had received 4890 devices at SMU (about 35% of the total) and delivered to CERN. “ mean?  Why deliver to CERN?  I have unlocked this.
-6.4.2: I have approved

-6.5.4: it’s a bit messy with first a segment on schedule variance, then an explanation of cost variance, then another segment on schedule variance.  Also the grammar is a bit iffy.  Given that we are on the eve of the holiday break, I have approved, but please pay a bit more attention next time.

-6.6.4 I have approved

-6.8.1 and 6.8.4 are still missing, so cc’ing Elliot and and Dan.

Best,

Gustaaf


> On Dec 19, 2024, at 09:28, Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu> wrote:
>
>
> Hello all,
>
> Please remind your teams to file their variance reports today.  The deadline is tomorrow and many are missing (6.4, 6.4.1, 6.4.2, 6.5.4, 6.6.4, 6.8.1, 6.8.4).  Below are comments on those that have been filed.
>
> Best,
>
> Gustaaf
>
> -6.4.3: I have approved, but presumably at some point the expensive LASPs and LASP test stands will be bought?  Something to consider for next month.
> -6.6: I have approved (but note that for the CSM we’ll just have to carry the variance, as most of that is in the past)
> -6.6.3: I have approved
> -6.6.5: I have approved (but maybe next month say something about the BCP in the corrective action here as well)
>