Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l - RE: [[Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] ] May VRs

usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: U.S. ATLAS HL-LHC Upgrade Level 2 and Deputies-NSF only Management Mailing List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Novakova, Penka N" <penka AT bnl.gov>
  • To: Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu>
  • Cc: "usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov>, Haleh Hadavand <hadavand AT uta.edu>, "Zhu, Junjie" <junjie AT umich.edu>, Thomas Andrew Schwarz <schwarzt AT umich.edu>, Elliot Lipeles <lipeles AT sas.upenn.edu>, Andy Haas <andy.haas AT nyu.edu>
  • Subject: RE: [[Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] ] May VRs
  • Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2025 13:42:56 +0000

I have submitted 6.6.3 and 6.6.4

 

From: usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l-request AT lists.bnl.gov <usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l-request AT lists.bnl.gov> On Behalf Of Gustaaf Brooijmans
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2025 7:28 AM
To: Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu>
Cc: usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l AT lists.bnl.gov; Haleh Hadavand <hadavand AT uta.edu>; Zhu, Junjie <junjie AT umich.edu>; Thomas Andrew Schwarz <schwarzt AT umich.edu>; Elliot Lipeles <lipeles AT sas.upenn.edu>; Andy Haas <andy.haas AT nyu.edu>
Subject: Re: [[Usatlas-hllhc-l2deputymgmt-nsf-l] ] May VRs

 

 

Hello all,

 

Today’s update:

 

-6.4.1: I have approved

-6.4.3: still needs to be updated after my earlier comment (see below)

 

-6.5.4: no cost variance report is required and none should be entered.  I have unlocked so you can remove that sentence from the explanation.

 

-6.6.3 needs to be submitted (Penka, can you do this? Thx)

-6.6.4 needs to be submitted (Penka, can you do this? Thx)

 

-6.8.4 I have approved

 

Best,

 

Gustaaf



On Jun 20, 2025, at 16:44, Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu> wrote:

 

 

Hello all,

 

The VRs are due.  Here are my comments on those that have been posted.  For the others, please do this asap (and make a note in your calendar to remind yourself the 15th of every month that this is due).

 

Best,

 

Gustaaf

 

 

-6.4: I have approved

-6.4.1 is missing

-6.4.3: you say "LASP delays have also caused money not to be spent on expensive LASPs and LASP test stands yet” but this would not cause a cost variance, as you would not have statused reception of these things.  Also, how can a 10% schedule variance have no impact?  Is there no actual delay?  (In his statement, John wrote "Overall the different elements of the LAr system range between about 1-3 months behind schedule.”)  => I’ve unlocked this.

 

-6.5.4 is missing

 

-6.6.1 I have approved

-6.6.3 needs to be submitted

-6.6.4 is missing

 

-6.8.1 I have approved

-6.8.4 is missing

 

 

 




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page