Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

usatlas-hllhc-lartl2l3-l - Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-lartl2l3-l] [Usatlas-hllhc-management-l] LAr replies to COVID delays

usatlas-hllhc-lartl2l3-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: U.S. ATLAS HL-LHC Upgrade LAr Level 2 and Level 3 Managers Mailing List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: John Parsons <parsons AT nevis.columbia.edu>
  • To: Gustaaf Brooijmans <gusbroo AT nevis.columbia.edu>, "usatlas-hllhc-management-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <usatlas-hllhc-management-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Cc: "usatlas-hllhc-lartl2l3-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <usatlas-hllhc-lartl2l3-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Usatlas-hllhc-lartl2l3-l] [Usatlas-hllhc-management-l] LAr replies to COVID delays
  • Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2020 12:04:42 -0400


Hi Gustaaf,

Thanks for the comments. I give replies below.

John

On 4/6/20 5:24 AM, Gustaaf Brooijmans wrote:

Hi John,

Thanks.  A couple of comments:
-we already had the BE firmware specs review.

- yes, but that was only for the LASP f/w, and specifically did NOT include the SRTM f/w. We assume therefore that a separate review will be needed for the SRTM f/w

-I don't think you should write "This is roughly estimated based on past experience (though we obviously don’t have directly comparable previous experience)".

- OK, will take that part out

-You write "This work cannot be done remotely... An estimate of the quantitative impact is a 3-month delay and increased labor costs of $30k."  We'll need to be careful with such statements, as they indicate standing army.  We don't have a clear statement from NSF yet about standing army.  We'll try to get that asap.

- the text includes these statements: "In the meantime, some effort can go into further improving and reviewing the design, though this will not significantly reduce the time needed later for testing. In addition, preparations are continuing to hold the ATLAS Specifications Verification Review (SVR) as scheduled on April 24; this work should not be impacted significantly by the TW situation."
- this was to make clear that there is work ongoing, and we are not paying "standing army". However, since the work that can be done is, in some sense, "extra" design work that will not reduce the labor needed later, there is an overall increase in the labor costs, which is the $30k estimate

Best,

Gustaaf


On 4/5/20 1:12 AM, John Parsons wrote:

Hi all,

     I attach the LAr replies to various COVID scenarios, as requested.
     Regards,
         John


--
______________________________________________________________________

John Parsons
Nevis Labs, Email: parsons AT nevis.columbia.edu
Columbia University Phone: (914) 591-2820
P.O. Box 137 Fax: (914) 591-8120
Irvington, NY 10533 WWW:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://www.nevis.columbia.edu/*parsons/__;fg!!P4SdNyxKAPE!XPv1-lefrL_eqq9w-f33P_CvFunYd283aihbLgEJWsGzQ0Q2oYd1zNFg0PnObJppbUegPGoAvGqDoVfqwOTY$


______________________________________________________________________




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page