e-rhic-ir-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: E-rhic-ir-l mailing list
List archive
- From: "Palmer, Robert" <palmer AT bnl.gov>
- To: Alexander Kiselev <kisselev AT mail.desy.de>
- Cc: "E-rhic-ir-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <E-rhic-ir-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Subject: Re: [E-rhic-ir-l] Discussion of parameter choices
- Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2017 22:50:55 +0000
Here are the magnet settings for the High Acceptance (HA) case together with
plot of positions and betas vs length. The pdf file gives the beam parameters
for 275 on 10.1 for 4 cases: HA, HL, FHA, FHL. The latter two with cooling.
Bob
## 20/3//2017 forward hadrons at 275 GeV/c
## using Palmer's file is beta82cp
## For 'High Acceptance' parameters giving, with electron energy 10.1 GeV,
Lum = 2.86 10^33
## Plots and other parameters will be distributed soon
##
## The design reflects uses the same magneta as "data82cg2" but different
fields
##
## Warning:
## This design was simulated by a home made program and may not exactly agree
with
## madX and other codes
## The detector solenoid is not included
## ----------------------------------------------------------
## Initial conditions at IP
##
## beta*_x beta*_y g emit_x g emit_y angle_x angle_y
## [m] [m] [nm] [nm] [mrad] [mrad]
5.6620 0.0420 16.5000 6.1000 22 0
## -----------------------------------------------------------
## magnet parameters
##
##name center_z center_x center_y radius length angle B
gradient
## [m] [m] [m] [m] [m] [mrad] [T]
[T/m]
##
B0pf 5.099 -0.0132 0.00 0.1700 1.200 -22.00 1.700 0.00
Q1pf 7.289 0.0020 0.00 0.0370 1.981 -4.00 0.000 -72.57
B1pf 13.198 0.0097 0.00 0.0890 4.800 2.80 -3.516 0.00
Q2pf 17.457 0.0484 0.00 0.1250 2.520 -2.00 0.000 -4.46
Q3pf 37.192 0.3692 0.00 0.0500 1.200 16.20 0.000 24.32
B2pf 44.091 0.4107 0.00 0.0510 7.800 -1.80 4.397 0.00
Q4pf 53.988 0.2701 0.00 0.0500 1.200 -22.00 0.000 28.96
B3pf 66.185 -0.0789 0.00 0.0500 8.800 -41.80 4.400 0.00
NQpf 72.984 -0.4202 0.00 0.0600 1.200 -63.54 0.000 -52.52
Q5pf 88.380 -1.3975 0.00 0.0400 1.000 -63.47 0.000 55.00
H1pf 93.754 -1.7386 0.00 0.0500 8.750 -63.45 0.000 0.00
Q6pf 104.626 -2.4288 0.00 0.0400 2.000 -63.45 0.000 27.50
## x=0, z=0, y=0 is at the center of the IP
## The z axis is aligned with the inital mean hadron direction
## The apertures of B2 and B3 may be too large requiring changes in settings
## H1 is the spin rotator assumed not to focus or bend
## Q5 and Q6 are place holder for strengths to be set by matching
##
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
##
## parameters at the Roman Pots
##
##loc Z beta_x beta_y adv_x adv_y Disp
## [m] [m] [m] rad/pi rad/pi {m}
##
R1 31.00 892.5 402.00 0.360 0.51 0.258
R2 35.00 1195.6 281.26 0.361 0.51 0.322
R3 83.55 14.7 12.54 0.464 0.72 -2.365
R4 86.40 5.0 4.25 0.572 0.84 -2.763
## Phase advance x in R3 should be kept to approx 0.5-0.6 and may need
tweeking
## beta_y in R3 should be 12 m or more
##--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
## The next iteration will/may:
## 1. lower beta_x at B2 and B3 to allow use of RHIC magnets
## 2. require a new quad between Current Q1 nd B1 for the VHL case
## 3. a lower beta_x at R3 and R4 to maintain acceptances
## 4. more space on the sides of the neutron detector
## 5. Move R1 to beyond the neutron detector
## These will presumably be for after the March review
Attachment:
rad82cp1.eps
Description: rad82cp1.eps
Attachment:
bet82cp1.eps
Description: bet82cp1.eps
Attachment:
PAR14HA2.pdf
Description: PAR14HA2.pdf
-
Re: [E-rhic-ir-l] Discussion of parameter choices,
Palmer, Robert, 03/09/2017
-
Re: [E-rhic-ir-l] Discussion of parameter choices,
Aschenauer Elke-Caroline, 03/09/2017
- Re: [E-rhic-ir-l] Discussion of parameter choices, Palmer, Robert, 03/09/2017
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
Re: [E-rhic-ir-l] Discussion of parameter choices,
Alexander Kiselev, 03/10/2017
- Re: [E-rhic-ir-l] Discussion of parameter choices, Palmer, Robert, 03/13/2017
- Re: [E-rhic-ir-l] Discussion of parameter choices, Palmer, Robert, 03/20/2017
-
Re: [E-rhic-ir-l] Discussion of parameter choices,
Palmer, Robert, 03/30/2017
-
Re: [E-rhic-ir-l] Discussion of parameter choices,
Alexander Kiselev, 03/30/2017
- Re: [E-rhic-ir-l] Discussion of parameter choices, Alexander Bazilevsky, 03/31/2017
-
Re: [E-rhic-ir-l] Discussion of parameter choices,
Alexander Kiselev, 03/30/2017
-
Re: [E-rhic-ir-l] Discussion of parameter choices,
Aschenauer Elke-Caroline, 03/09/2017
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.