Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sphenix-calibration-l - Re: [Sphenix-calibration-l] Draft slides for tomorrow's General Meeting

sphenix-calibration-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: Sphenix-calibration-l mailing list

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Christof Roland <christof.roland AT cern.ch>
  • To: Hugo Pereira Da Costa <hugo.pereira-da-costa AT cea.fr>
  • Cc: Hugo Pereira Da Costa via sPHENIX-calibration-l <sphenix-calibration-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Sphenix-calibration-l] Draft slides for tomorrow's General Meeting
  • Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2020 16:55:29 +0200

Hi Hugo

> On 7. Aug 2020, at 16:35, Hugo Pereira Da Costa
> <hugo.pereira-da-costa AT cea.fr> wrote:
>
> Hi Christof,
>
> thanks for the comments. Will implement !
>
> For the TPC occupancy, I 'think' I have the information at hand to get the
> occupancy, but it needs a bit of working, and won't be ready for today's
> meeting. (likely next week though). The reason is that occupancy must be
> evaluated only in a given "time slice" (right ?), or possibly integrated
> over timeslices, but without double counting ? In fact I am not completely
> sure how you define occupancy in a TPC ...

The relevant quantity is usually the channel occupancy. i.e. how many
channels are above threshold. So within a layer check how many channels are
hit devided by the total number of channels.
Within a time slice is not so usefull because the occupancy has a rather
pronounced radial dependence.

Cheers

Christof


> The "Same order of magnitude" statement in slide 10 comes from a comment
> from Tony during the presentation.
>
> Hugo
>
>
> On 8/7/20 8:22 AM, Christof Roland wrote:
>> Hi Hugo,
>>
>> thanks a lot for preparing the slides.
>> I have a few comments, see below.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Christof
>>
>> Slide 4
>> a good part of the milestones / deadlines are in the past already or
>> imminent.
>> It would be good to point this out on the slide or color code this
>> somehow if the task has actually be completed.
>>
>> Slide 7
>> Do we have occupancy plots for the TPC as well?
>>
>> Slide 8
>> Maybe mark a bit better that this refers to the micromegas only the layer
>> 55+ 56 label may not be obvious to everybody.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Christof
>>
>>> On 6. Aug 2020, at 21:30, Hugo Pereira Da Costa via sPHENIX-calibration-l
>>> <sphenix-calibration-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> attached a first draft of the slides for tomorrow's General Meeting
>>>
>>> Comments/corrections/additions welcome,
>>>
>>>
>>> Hugo
>>>
>>>
>>> <talk.pdf>_______________________________________________
>>> sPHENIX-calibration-l mailing list
>>> sPHENIX-calibration-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/sphenix-calibration-l





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page