sPHENIX is a new detector at RHIC.

[Oliver Suranyi <osuranyi AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Dear Ejiro, Dennis, all,

Thank you very much for the feedback!
I updated the poster based on your suggestions.
If you have any additional comments, let me know until 5pm, because I 
have to submit the poster for printing today.

Best regards,
Oliver



On 2023-06-07 20:00, Ejiro Umaka wrote:
> Hi Oliver,
>
> Nice poster. I have few comments. Please see below:
>
> In the top right plot titled Calibration of the outer oHCAL with
> cosmic muons. I would change the wording a bit, because this is not
> finalized, it was a step to see if the cosmic muon simulation
> generates a shape similar to the data. Also the set up was with the
> entire oHCAL. I assume the finalized calibration should involve a
> tower by tower calibration.
>
> A small cosmetic change will be useful for the plot right below
> showing a correlation between the outer and inner hcal. The distance
> of the x-axis title to the x-axis is not the same distance as in the
> y-axis. Although the appropriate persons have been notified, I leave
> this here since there was another presentation from sPHENIX with the
> same plot at the same conference.
>
> For the sPHENIX detector, are you against using the one here:
> https://www.sphenix.bnl.gov
> This way there is no need for the text stating that the sEPD and MBD
> are not depicted.
>
> Right below the sPHENIX detector, I believe we agreed that simulations
> should be named sPHENIX simulation not sPHENIX G4 Sim.
> Following up on these plots, is there a need to state that the
> underlying event subtraction does not include flow? Does the audience
> care? I also have trouble reconciling showing the centrality
> dependence in the jet energy scale at low pT- is the point to say we
> don't have our UE subtraction under control in this range?
>
> In the jet physics predictions section what does the audience gain by
> stating: most theoretical models have not been able to simultaneously
> describe the RAA and v2? Can you make your point clearer?
>
> Lastly, in the R-dependence of the RAA, it might be useful to change
> the wording from sPHENIX can make an accurate measurement in this
> region to something like sPHENIX measurement will cover this kinematic
> region and help to reduce the tension between the ALICE and ATLAS
> measurements. I think using "accurate", while I'm confident with what
> will be done at sPHENIX, the statement may appear too strong and may
> imply that the other LHC measurements might be inaccurate.
>
> Best regards,
> Ejiro
>
> On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 2:24 PM Oliver Suranyi via sPHENIX-l
> <sphenix-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
>
> > Dear Colleagues,
> >
> > I will bring a poster to the Initial Stages 2023 conference (June
> > 19-23).
> > I attached the draft version of the poster to this mail.
> > Let me know if you have any comments by June 14, so I will have time
> > to
> > print the final poster.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Oliver
> > _______________________________________________
> > sPHENIX-l mailing list
> > sPHENIX-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/sphenix-l

Attachment: IS2023_sPHENIX_JetPhysics_OliverSuranyi_v3.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document