Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sphenix-tracking-l - [[Sphenix-tracking-l] ] CM Distortion Matching Schemes

sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: sPHENIX tracking discussion

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Kimelman, Benjamin" <benjamin.kimelman AT Vanderbilt.Edu>
  • To: "Osborn, Joseph via sPHENIX-tracking-l" <sphenix-tracking-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: [[Sphenix-tracking-l] ] CM Distortion Matching Schemes
  • Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2024 18:19:16 +0000

Hi all,

I've put together some slides following up on the figures I showed today about changing to a nearest neighbor matching scheme. I've zoomed in as Christof suggested and also selected on just a single truth position as Ross suggested (I selected on truthIndex 1600, which is petal 0, row 16, phi 0). These clearly show that the NN scheme is more robust and gives better performance.

My slides don't include every histogram from all pedestal subtraction thresholds, so I'm including files that have those as well.

Let me know if you have any questions or feedback.

Vanderbilt
 
Benjamin Kimelman
Postdoctoral Scholar, Dept. of Physics & Astronomy
Vanderbilt University
benjamin.kimelman AT vanderbilt.edu
Pronouns: He/him/his

Attachment: TPC Distortion Matching Schemes.pdf
Description: TPC Distortion Matching Schemes.pdf

Attachment: fancyComparisonZoom1600.pdf
Description: fancyComparisonZoom1600.pdf

Attachment: fancyComparison1600.pdf
Description: fancyComparison1600.pdf

Attachment: fancyComparisonZoom.pdf
Description: fancyComparisonZoom.pdf

Attachment: fancyComparison.pdf
Description: fancyComparison.pdf




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page