STAR Correlations and Fluctuations PWG

[Hanna Paulina Zbroszczyk <hanna.zbroszczyk AT pw.edu.pl>]

Dear Moe,

Please find below my comments to your nice presentation:

Slide 2: add a reference to the last ALICE paper: S. Acharya et al.,  Nature 588, 232  (2020)

Slide 4: Add spaces between run years (the table)

Slide 5: Add space between Mass(from..) -> Mass (from ..)

Slide 9: add definition of k*

Slide 10: add definition ok Qinv

With those implemented I sign off.

Enjoy the conference!

Thanks,

Hanna et al.

(ALICE Collaboration), Nature588S. Acharyaet al.(ALICE Collaboration), Nature588, 232 (2020)

Hanna Paulina Zbroszczyk

PhD DSc Eng, Professor WUT

E-mail: hanna.zbroszczyk AT pw.edu.pl

Tel: +48 22 234 5851 (office)

Address:

Warsaw University of Technology

Faculty of Physics

Nuclear Physics Division

Koszykowa 75

Office: 117b (via 115)

00-662 Warsaw, Poland

Wiadomość napisana przez misshiki via Star-cf-l <star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov> w dniu 15.05.2021, o godz. 14:38:

Dear Xiaofeng,

Thank you for your comments.
And I also got the comments form TSUKUBA group.
so I modified .

Please check.
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/sqm-2021/measurements-%CE%BB%E3%83%BC%CE%BB%CE%BE%E3%83%BC%CE%BE-and-p-%CE%BE-correlation-auau-collisions-%E2%88%9Asnn-200-gev-rhic-sta


Best regards,
Moe




On 2021-05-15 01:28, Xiaofeng Luo via Star-cf-l wrote:

Hi Moe,
    Nice presentation.
    Please find my comments/suggestions below :
    General comments : You may enlarge your font size of your text in
each slides. Now, it looks a little bit small.
    1. Title : maybe you want put "p-Xi" before "Lambda-Lambda",
because you disucss p-Xi first in your following slides.
    2. Slide 4, theminimum-bias trigger -> the minimum-bias trigger
    3. Slide 5, M^2, please define M^2 and put unit behind.
    4. Slide 9: You may mention it is "First measurement of p-Xi in
Au+Au collisions".
    5. Slide 10, please replace the figure with the one that Ke Mi
sent to you, in which with less source sizes are used.
    6. which suggests strong interaction -> which suggests attractive
strong interaction
    7. Slide 2, "Baryon-baryon interactions are not understood very
well." I am not sure what you want to say with this sentence.
                     I suggest to re-write or remove it.
    With those implemented, I sign off.
Thank you,
Best Regards,
Xiaofeng
On 2021/5/10 22:47, webmaster--- via Star-cf-l wrote:

Dear star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
Moe Isshiki (k0nchar0127 AT gmail.com) has submitted a material for a review,
please have a look:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/54908
---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
_______________________________________________
Star-cf-l mailing list
Star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-cf-l

_______________________________________________
Star-cf-l mailing list
Star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-cf-l

_______________________________________________
Star-cf-l mailing list
Star-cf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-cf-l